175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31010730)
1. Three-dimensional skeletal and dental patterns obtained from cone-beam computer tomography of patients diagnosed as malocclusion class I.
Lee H; Oh HS; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 31010730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malocclusion Class II division 1 skeletal and dental relationships measured by cone-beam computed tomography.
Xu Y; Oh H; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):365-387. PubMed ID: 28818647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the pharyngeal airway space, measured with cone beam computed tomography, between patients with different craniofacial morphologies.
Dalmau E; Zamora N; Tarazona B; Gandia JL; Paredes V
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1438-46. PubMed ID: 26189145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skeletal and dental relationships in vertical/non-vertical growers using CBCT.
Tung K; Lagravère MO
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 30770335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study.
Di Carlo G; Polimeni A; Melsen B; Cattaneo PM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25237711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of conventional 2D lateral cephalometry using 3D cone beam CT.
Shaw K; McIntyre G; Mossey P; Menhinick A; Thomson D
J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 23524544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of mandible symmetry and the occlusal plane of adult patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion and jaw deformity.
Teng C; Liu C; Yu Q; Liu S
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jul; 127():105157. PubMed ID: 34015688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.
Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of three-dimensional coordinate systems based on craniofacial landmarks: a tentative evaluation of four systems created on images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography with a large field of view.
Shibata M; Nawa H; Kise Y; Fuyamada M; Yoshida K; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):776-84. PubMed ID: 22348241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of cone beam CT for morphometry of nasolabial soft tissue in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Xu W; Lu R; Hu Y; Cao L; Wang T; Tan H; Meng X; Ming Y; Zheng L
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 34719475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements.
Farronato M; Maspero C; Abate A; Grippaudo C; Connelly ST; Tartaglia GM
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6295-6302. PubMed ID: 32382843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of skeletal class in the morphology of cervical vertebrae: A study using cone beam computed tomography.
Aranitasi L; Tarazona B; Zamora N; Gandía JL; Paredes V
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 27513029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
