278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31010744)
1. EUS-guided core biopsies of pancreatic solid masses using a new fork-tip needle: A multicenter prospective study.
Di Leo M; Crinò SF; Bernardoni L; Rahal D; Auriemma F; Correale L; Donato G; Massidda M; Anderloni A; Manfrin E; Armellini E; Poliani L; Fugazza A; Semeraro R; Occhipinti P; Repici A; Carrara S
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Sep; 51(9):1275-1280. PubMed ID: 31010744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study.
Rodrigues-Pinto E; Jalaj S; Grimm IS; Baron TH
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 27345131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Larghi A; Iglesias-Garcia J; Poley JW; Monges G; Petrone MC; Rindi G; Abdulkader I; Arcidiacono PG; Costamagna G; Biermann K; Bories E; Doglioni C; Dominguez-Muñoz JE; Hassan C; Bruno M; Giovannini M
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3733-8. PubMed ID: 23644834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study).
Iwashita T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Doi S; Nakashima M; Uemura S; Mabuchi M; Shimizu M; Hatano Y; Hara A; Moriwaki H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jan; 81(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 25440688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study.
Vanbiervliet G; Napoléon B; Saint Paul MC; Sakarovitch C; Wangermez M; Bichard P; Subtil C; Koch S; Grandval P; Gincul R; Karsenti D; Heyries L; Duchmann JC; Bourgaux JF; Levy M; Calament G; Fumex F; Pujol B; Lefort C; Poincloux L; Pagenault M; Bonin EA; Fabre M; Barthet M
Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1063-70. PubMed ID: 25098612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating triage protocols for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsies of the pancreas.
Fitzpatrick MJ; Hernandez-Barco YG; Krishnan K; Casey B; Pitman MB
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):396-404. PubMed ID: 32620535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histological diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using a 25-gauge needle with a core trap: A multicenter prospective trial.
Kamata K; Ashida R; Yasukawa S; Chiba Y; Fukutake N; Nebiki H; Kurita A; Takaoka M; Ogura T; Shiomi H; Asada M; Yasuda H; Shigekawa M; Yanagisawa A; Kudo M; Kitano M
Pancreatology; 2020 Oct; 20(7):1428-1433. PubMed ID: 32952043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jun; 87(6):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 29305893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
