434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31011783)
1. Comparison of different fractionation strategies for in-depth phosphoproteomics by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Yeh TT; Ho MY; Chen WY; Hsu YC; Ku WC; Tseng HW; Chen ST; Chen SF
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2019 Jun; 411(15):3417-3424. PubMed ID: 31011783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Highly sensitive phosphoproteomics by tailoring solid-phase extraction to electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
Loroch S; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Anal Chem; 2015 Feb; 87(3):1596-604. PubMed ID: 25405705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics.
Batth TS; Francavilla C; Olsen JV
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):6176-86. PubMed ID: 25338131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combinatorial use of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) and strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.
Zarei M; Sprenger A; Gretzmeier C; Dengjel J
J Proteome Res; 2012 Aug; 11(8):4269-76. PubMed ID: 22768876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid Shotgun Phosphoproteomics Analysis.
Carrera M; Cañas B; Lopez-Ferrer D
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2259():259-268. PubMed ID: 33687721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ERLIC-TiO2, HILIC-TiO2, and SCX-TiO2 for global phosphoproteomics approaches.
Zarei M; Sprenger A; Metzger F; Gretzmeier C; Dengjel J
J Proteome Res; 2011 Aug; 10(8):3474-83. PubMed ID: 21682340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and application of a phosphoproteomic method using electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC), IMAC, and LC-MS/MS analysis to study Marek's Disease Virus infection.
Chien KY; Liu HC; Goshe MB
J Proteome Res; 2011 Sep; 10(9):4041-53. PubMed ID: 21736374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid combinatorial ERLIC-SCX solid-phase extraction for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.
Zarei M; Sprenger A; Gretzmeier C; Dengjel J
J Proteome Res; 2013 Dec; 12(12):5989-95. PubMed ID: 24144214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finding the Sweet Spot in ERLIC Mobile Phase for Simultaneous Enrichment of N-Glyco and Phosphopeptides.
Cui Y; Yang K; Tabang DN; Huang J; Tang W; Li L
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2491-2501. PubMed ID: 31286442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast Global Phosphoproteome Profiling of Jurkat T Cells by HIFU-TiO
Carrera M; Cañas B; Lopez-Ferrer D
Anal Chem; 2017 Sep; 89(17):8853-8862. PubMed ID: 28787133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast and easy phosphopeptide fractionation by combinatorial ERLIC-SCX solid-phase extraction for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis.
Zarei M; Sprenger A; Rackiewicz M; Dengjel J
Nat Protoc; 2016 Jan; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 26633130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography to the characterization of proteome, glycoproteome, and phosphoproteome using nano LC-MS/MS.
Hao P; Zhang H; Sze SK
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 790():305-18. PubMed ID: 21948424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multidimensional electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) for quantitative analysis of the proteome and phosphoproteome in clinical and biomedical research.
Loroch S; Schommartz T; Brune W; Zahedi RP; Sickmann A
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 May; 1854(5):460-8. PubMed ID: 25619855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Macroporous reversed-phase separation of proteins combined with reversed-phase separation of phosphopeptides and tandem mass spectrometry for profiling the phosphoproteome of MDA-MB-231 cells.
Ye X; Li L
Electrophoresis; 2014 Dec; 35(24):3479-86. PubMed ID: 24888630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enrichment Strategies in Phosphoproteomics.
Leitner A
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1355():105-21. PubMed ID: 26584921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complementary workflow for global phosphoproteome analysis.
Li QR; Ning ZB; Yang XL; Wu JR; Zeng R
Electrophoresis; 2012 Nov; 33(22):3291-8. PubMed ID: 23097065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining Metabolic ¹⁵N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome.
Thomas M; Huck N; Hoehenwarter W; Conrath U; Beckers GJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():81-96. PubMed ID: 25930695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving depth in phosphoproteomics by using a strong cation exchange-weak anion exchange-reversed phase multidimensional separation approach.
Hennrich ML; Groenewold V; Kops GJ; Heck AJ; Mohammed S
Anal Chem; 2011 Sep; 83(18):7137-43. PubMed ID: 21815630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of a TiO₂ enrichment method for label-free quantitative phosphoproteomics.
Montoya A; Beltran L; Casado P; Rodríguez-Prados JC; Cutillas PR
Methods; 2011 Aug; 54(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 21316455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractionation of Enriched Phosphopeptides Using pH/Acetonitrile-Gradient-Reversed-Phase Microcolumn Separation in Combination with LC-MS/MS Analysis.
Ondrej M; Rehulka P; Rehulkova H; Kupcik R; Tichy A
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jun; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32492839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
