These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31011893)

  • 1. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
    Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1940764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
    McCarthy DC; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching is acquired faster than mismatching by pigeons when salient stimuli are presented manually.
    Zentall TR; Brantley SM; Mueller PM; Peng DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104798. PubMed ID: 36460138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Alsop B; Jones BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
    Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
    Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 10784006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shared attention in pigeons.
    Maki WS; Leith CR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 4706238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the role of alternative response rates and reinforcer rates in resistance to extinction of target responding when combining stimuli.
    Podlesnik CA; Bai JY; Skinner KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):427-44. PubMed ID: 27193243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.