250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31011893)
1. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.
Alsop B; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1940764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
McCarthy DC; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Matching is acquired faster than mismatching by pigeons when salient stimuli are presented manually.
Zentall TR; Brantley SM; Mueller PM; Peng DN
Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104798. PubMed ID: 36460138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
Alsop B; Jones BM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
Mazur JE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
Kuroda T; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control.
Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Nov; 68(3):303-16. PubMed ID: 9375385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfer of pigeons' matching to sample to novel sample locations.
Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 10784006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shared attention in pigeons.
Maki WS; Leith CR
J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 4706238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the role of alternative response rates and reinforcer rates in resistance to extinction of target responding when combining stimuli.
Podlesnik CA; Bai JY; Skinner KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):427-44. PubMed ID: 27193243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
