These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31011893)

  • 41. "Distractor" effects in delay discounting of probability by pigeons.
    Mueller PM; Peng DN; Zentall TR
    Anim Cogn; 2023 Jun; 26(3):1073-1081. PubMed ID: 36853524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 25219928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Do pigeons prefer alternatives that include near-hit outcomes?
    Stagner JP; Case JP; Sticklen MF; Duncan AK; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 26167775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Divided attention and the matching law: sample duration affects sensitivity to reinforcement allocation.
    Shahan TA; Podlesnik CA
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 17918419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Jan; 59(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 8433063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Arousal, changeover responses, and preference in concurrent schedules.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 14964707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Signaled and unsignaled terminal links in concurrent chains I: effects of reinforcer probability and immediacy.
    Mattson KM; Hucks A; Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Nov; 94(3):327-52. PubMed ID: 21541175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The representation of the reinforcer and the force of the pigeon's keypeck in first- and second-order conditioning.
    Stanhope KJ
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Feb; 44(2):137-58. PubMed ID: 1561383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Processing of conflicting and redundant stimulus information by pigeons.
    Yokoyama K; Dailey D; Chase S
    Learn Behav; 2006 Aug; 34(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 17089591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Symmetry in the pigeon with sample and comparison stimuli in different locations.
    Swisher M; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Jul; 100(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 23703090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice.
    DiGan KA; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2007 Nov; 35(4):242-51. PubMed ID: 18047222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.
    González-Torres R; Flores J; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2020 Sep; 178():104157. PubMed ID: 32497555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Response rate is not an effective mediator of learned stimulus equivalence in pigeons.
    Frank AJ; Wasserman EA
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 16396076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of relative reinforcer frequency on complex color detection.
    Davison M; McCarthy D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 May; 51(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 16812580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
    García A; Benjumea S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Conditioned reinforcement by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 3361266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.
    Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stimulus control depends on the subjective value of the outcome.
    Cowie S; Gomes-Ng S; Hopkinson B; Bai JYH; Landon J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Sep; 114(2):216-232. PubMed ID: 32820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.