1160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31012125)
1. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-I/T PET-CT and Multiparametric MRI for Locoregional Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.
Çelen S; Gültekin A; Özlülerden Y; Mete A; Sağtaş E; Ufuk F; Yüksel D; Yağcı B; Zümrütbaş AE
Urol Int; 2020; 104(9-10):684-691. PubMed ID: 32750695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mp-MRI in regard to local staging for prostate cancer with histopathological results: A retrospective study.
Ucar T; Gunduz N; Demirci E; Culpan M; Gunel H; Kir G; Atis RG; Yildirim A
Prostate; 2022 Nov; 82(15):1462-1468. PubMed ID: 35915579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Exterkate L; Hermsen R; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Prette JF; Baas DJH; Somford DM; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):574-581. PubMed ID: 37230883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI versus
Muehlematter UJ; Burger IA; Becker AS; Schawkat K; Hötker AM; Reiner CS; Müller J; Rupp NJ; Rüschoff JH; Eberli D; Donati OF
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 31502937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.
Budäus L; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Steuber T; Rosenbaum C
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 26116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of the performance of [
Abufaraj M; Grubmüller B; Zeitlinger M; Kramer G; Seitz C; Haitel A; Baltzer P; Hacker M; Wadsak W; Pfaff S; Wiatr T; Mitterhauser M; Shariat SF; Hartenbach M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Sep; 46(10):2169-2177. PubMed ID: 31254037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incremental Impact of [
Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of
Zhang Q; Zang S; Zhang C; Fu Y; Lv X; Zhang Q; Deng Y; Zhang C; Luo R; Zhao X; Wang W; Wang F; Guo H
J Transl Med; 2017 Nov; 15(1):230. PubMed ID: 29115970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Sonni I; Felker ER; Lenis AT; Sisk AE; Bahri S; Allen-Auerbach M; Armstrong WR; Suvannarerg V; Tubtawee T; Grogan T; Elashoff D; Eiber M; Raman SS; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
J Nucl Med; 2022 Jun; 63(6):847-854. PubMed ID: 34649942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body
Thalgott M; Düwel C; Rauscher I; Heck MM; Haller B; Gafita A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 29794224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Prostate MRI Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT in the Evaluation Lymph Node Involvement and Extraprostatic Extension.
Arslan A; Karaarslan E; Güner AL; Sağlıcan Y; Tuna MB; Kural AR
Acad Radiol; 2022 May; 29(5):698-704. PubMed ID: 32768351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pilot study of the diagnostic utility of
Vlachostergios PJ; Niaz MJ; Thomas C; Christos PJ; Osborne JR; Margolis DJA; Khani F; Bander NH; Scherr DS; Tagawa ST
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):483-492. PubMed ID: 34985786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
