210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31012352)
1. Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions.
Abe A; Sezaki T; Kinoshita K
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 30(4):279-298. PubMed ID: 31012352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A ready-to-use integrated in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing strategy using EpiSkin™ model in China.
Liu Y; Li N; Chen L; Alépée N; Cai Z
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Jun; 65():104778. PubMed ID: 31962199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An integrated testing strategy for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation assessment using SkinEthic™ Reconstructed Human Epidermis.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Tornier C; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1779-92. PubMed ID: 26187475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis model within Integrated Approaches on Testing and Assessment (IATA) for skin corrosion and irritation.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Feb; 54():147-167. PubMed ID: 30266437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of skin irritation/corrosion potential: structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system.
Saliner AG; Tsakovska I; Pavan M; Patlewicz G; Worth AP
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(3-4):331-42. PubMed ID: 17514574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part I: Skin.
Charmeau-Genevois C; Sarang S; Perea M; Eadsforth C; Austin T; Thomas P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jul; 123():104922. PubMed ID: 33819554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fibrin-based dermal-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro skin corrosion and irritation testing of chemicals according to OECD TG 431 and 439.
Morales M; Pérez D; Correa L; Restrepo L
Toxicol In Vitro; 2016 Oct; 36():89-96. PubMed ID: 27448499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the human epidermal model LabCyte EPI-MODEL for In vitro skin corrosion testing according to the OECD test guideline 431.
Katoh M; Hamajima F; Ogasawara T; Hata K
J Toxicol Sci; 2010 Jun; 35(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20519850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dermo-epidermal organotypic cultures for in vitro evaluation of skin irritation and corrosion.
Gaviria Agudelo C; Becerra NY; Vergara JD; Correa LA; Estrada S; Restrepo LM
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Mar; 63():104657. PubMed ID: 31644923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model.
Kidd DA; Johnson M; Clements J
Toxicol In Vitro; 2007 Oct; 21(7):1292-7. PubMed ID: 17936572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.
Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V
Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulatory assessment of in vitro skin corrosion and irritation data within the European framework: Workshop recommendations.
Eskes C; Detappe V; Koëter H; Kreysa J; Liebsch M; Zuang V; Amcoff P; Barroso J; Cotovio J; Guest R; Hermann M; Hoffmann S; Masson P; Alépée N; Arce LA; Brüschweiler B; Catone T; Cihak R; Clouzeau J; D'Abrosca F; Delveaux C; Derouette JP; Engelking O; Facchini D; Fröhlicher M; Hofmann M; Hopf N; Molinari J; Oberli A; Ott M; Peter R; Sá-Rocha VM; Schenk D; Tomicic C; Vanparys P; Verdon B; Wallenhorst T; Winkler GC; Depallens O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Mar; 62(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 22085589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro skin corrosion: Human skin model test - A validation study.
Deshmukh GR; Kumar KH; Reddy PV; Rao BS
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Sep; 26(6):1072-4. PubMed ID: 22542585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of existing (Q)SAR models for skin and eye irritation and corrosion to use for REACH registration.
Verheyen GR; Braeken E; Van Deun K; Van Miert S
Toxicol Lett; 2017 Jan; 265():47-52. PubMed ID: 27865849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the chemical-induced eye injury using a weight-of-evidence (WoE) battery of 21 artificial neural network (ANN) c-QSAR models (QSAR-21): part I: irritation potential.
Verma RP; Matthews EJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):318-30. PubMed ID: 25497990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in classification for skin corrosion/irritation in EU and Ukraine: Case study of alternative (in vitro and in silico) methods application for classification of pesticide active ingredient imazamox.
Kolesnyk S; Bubalo N; Prodanchuk M; Zhminko P
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Oct; 60():71-75. PubMed ID: 31100379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sub-categorisation of skin corrosive chemicals by the EpiSkin™ reconstructed human epidermis skin corrosion test method according to UN GHS: revision of OECD Test Guideline 431.
Alépée N; Grandidier MH; Cotovio J;
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Mar; 28(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 24211528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of the chemical-induced eye injury using a Weight-of-Evidence (WoE) battery of 21 artificial neural network (ANN) c-QSAR models (QSAR-21): part II: corrosion potential.
Verma RP; Matthews EJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 25510831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A strategy for skin irritation testing.
Robinson MK; Perkins MA
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Mar; 13(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 11887101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
