These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31012498)

  • 1. Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial).
    van Hilst J; Strating EA; de Rooij T; Daams F; Festen S; Groot Koerkamp B; Klaase JM; Luyer M; Dijkgraaf MG; Besselink MG;
    Br J Surg; 2019 Jun; 106(7):910-921. PubMed ID: 31012498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    de Rooij T; van Hilst J; Vogel JA; van Santvoort HC; de Boer MT; Boerma D; van den Boezem PB; Bonsing BA; Bosscha K; Coene PP; Daams F; van Dam RM; Dijkgraaf MG; van Eijck CH; Festen S; Gerhards MF; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; van der Harst E; de Hingh IH; Dejong CH; Kazemier G; Klaase J; de Kleine RH; van Laarhoven CJ; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Molenaar IQ; Nieuwenhuijs VB; Patijn GA; Roos D; Scheepers JJ; van der Schelling GP; Steenvoorde P; Swijnenburg RJ; Wijsman JH; Abu Hilal M; Busch OR; Besselink MG;
    Trials; 2017 Apr; 18(1):166. PubMed ID: 28388963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Souche R; Herrero A; Bourel G; Chauvat J; Pirlet I; Guillon F; Nocca D; Borie F; Mercier G; Fabre JM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3562-3569. PubMed ID: 29396754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.
    De Pastena M; Esposito A; Paiella S; Surci N; Montagnini G; Marchegiani G; Malleo G; Secchettin E; Casetti L; Ricci C; Landoni L; Bovo C; Bassi C; Salvia R
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1420-1428. PubMed ID: 32240383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial.
    Korrel M; Roelofs A; van Hilst J; Busch OR; Daams F; Festen S; Groot Koerkamp B; Klaase J; Luyer MD; van Oijen MG; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Besselink MG;
    J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Dec; 233(6):730-739.e9. PubMed ID: 34530127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nationwide cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.
    De Pastena M; Esposito A; Paiella S; Montagnini G; Zingaretti CC; Ramera M; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Kauffmann EF; Giardino A; Moraldi L; Butturini G; Boggi U; Salvia R
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Oct; 38(10):5881-5890. PubMed ID: 39164438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Benign or Premalignant Pancreatic Lesions: Is It Really More Cost-Effective than Open Approach?
    Ricci C; Casadei R; Taffurelli G; Bogoni S; D'Ambra M; Ingaldi C; Pagano N; Pacilio CA; Minni F
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Aug; 19(8):1415-24. PubMed ID: 26001367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of cost-effectiveness among open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Partelli S; Ricci C; Cinelli L; Montorsi RM; Ingaldi C; Andreasi V; Crippa S; Alberici L; Casadei R; Falconi M
    Am J Surg; 2021 Sep; 222(3):513-520. PubMed ID: 33853724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of 90-day cost for open versus minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.
    Fisher AV; Fernandes-Taylor S; Schumacher JR; Havlena JA; Wang X; Lawson EH; Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM; Winslow ER; Weber SM; Abbott DE
    HPB (Oxford); 2019 Jan; 21(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 30076011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study.
    Lee JS; Oh HL; Yoon YS; Han HS; Cho JY; Lee HW; Lee B; Kang M; Park Y; Kim J
    Surgery; 2024 Aug; 176(2):427-432. PubMed ID: 38772778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
    de Rooij T; van Hilst J; van Santvoort H; Boerma D; van den Boezem P; Daams F; van Dam R; Dejong C; van Duyn E; Dijkgraaf M; van Eijck C; Festen S; Gerhards M; Groot Koerkamp B; de Hingh I; Kazemier G; Klaase J; de Kleine R; van Laarhoven C; Luyer M; Patijn G; Steenvoorde P; Suker M; Abu Hilal M; Busch O; Besselink M;
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jan; 269(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 30080726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness and perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy.
    Magge DR; Zenati MS; Hamad A; Rieser C; Zureikat AH; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME
    HPB (Oxford); 2018 Dec; 20(12):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 31217087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
    Vicente E; Núñez-Alfonsel J; Ielpo B; Ferri V; Caruso R; Duran H; Diaz E; Malave L; Fabra I; Pinna E; Isernia R; Hidalgo A; Quijano Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Apr; 16(2):e2080. PubMed ID: 32026577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and the cost of conversion.
    Stewart CL; Wong P; Selby L; Warner SG; Raoof M; Singh G; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 121(4):670-675. PubMed ID: 31967336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the economic efficiency of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Koh YX; Zhao Y; Tan IE; Tan HL; Chua DW; Loh WL; Tan EK; Teo JY; Au MKH; Goh BKP
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3035-3051. PubMed ID: 38777892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective?
    Waters JA; Canal DF; Wiebke EA; Dumas RP; Beane JD; Aguilar-Saavedra JR; Ball CG; House MG; Zyromski NJ; Nakeeb A; Pitt HA; Lillemoe KD; Schmidt CM
    Surgery; 2010 Oct; 148(4):814-23. PubMed ID: 20797748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.
    Simianu VV; Gaertner WB; Kuntz K; Kwaan MR; Lowry AC; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
    Ann Surg; 2020 Aug; 272(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 32675547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
    Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.
    Gurusamy KS; Riviere D; van Laarhoven CJH; Besselink M; Abu-Hilal M; Davidson BR; Morris S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189631. PubMed ID: 29272281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.