These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31012746)

  • 1. The language and communication attributes of graphic symbol communication aids - a systematic review and narrative synthesis.
    Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Lynch Y; Moulam L; Meredith S; Murray J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Aug; 15(6):652-662. PubMed ID: 31012746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attributes of communication aids as described by those supporting children and young people with AAC.
    Judge S; Murray J; Lynch Y; Meredith S; Moulam L; Randall N; Whittle H; Goldbart J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 May; 58(3):910-928. PubMed ID: 36565242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expressive and receptive performance with graphic symbol sentences by individuals who use aided communication.
    Sutton A; Trudeau N; Morford JP; Smith MM; Mascolo MÈ
    Augment Altern Commun; 2022 Sep; 38(3):135-147. PubMed ID: 35726671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 1: system description.
    Tönsing KM; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 36417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning graphic symbols in two languages: Effects of monolingual teaching.
    Tönsing KM; Dada S
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2023 Apr; 25(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 37139671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Sep; 30(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 25109228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designing electronic graphic symbol-based AAC systems: a scoping review. Part 2: application of human-centred design.
    Tönsing K; Bartram J; Morwane RE; Waller A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 36413429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of environmental sounds on the guessability of animated graphic symbols.
    Harmon AC; Schlosser RW; Gygi B; Shane HC; Kong YY; Book L; Macduff K; Hearn E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2014 Dec; 30(4):298-313. PubMed ID: 25384797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children.
    Worah S; McNaughton D; Light J; Benedek-Wood E
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015; 17(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 25592055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment.
    Webb EJD; Lynch Y; Meads D; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(11):e030274. PubMed ID: 31791963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of augmentative and alternative communication interventions on the receptive language skills of children with developmental disabilities: A scoping review.
    Dada S; Flores C; Bastable K; Schlosser RW
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jun; 23(3):247-257. PubMed ID: 32893695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between lexicon and grammar in children and youth who use augmentative and alternative communication.
    Soto G; Clarke MT; Savaldi-Harussi G
    Augment Altern Commun; 2023 Dec; 39(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 37671918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the learnability and retention between Blissymbols and CyberGlyphs.
    Alant E; Life H; Harty M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 16101272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems.
    Clarke M; McConachie H; Price K; Wood P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2001; 36(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 11221427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems.
    Trudeau N; Sutton A; Morford JP; Côté-Giroux P; Pauzé AM; Vallée V
    Augment Altern Commun; 2010 Dec; 26(4):299-312. PubMed ID: 21091304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking Early Sentence-Building Progress in Graphic Symbol Communication.
    Binger C; Kent-Walsh J; Harrington N; Hollerbach QC
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Apr; 51(2):317-328. PubMed ID: 32255753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Core vocabulary lists for young children and considerations for early language development: a narrative review.
    Laubscher E; Light J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2020 Mar; 36(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 32172598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Language and Communication Characteristics of Communication Aids - A Systematic Review.
    Judge S; Randall N; Lynch Y; Meredith S; Moulam L; Murray J; Goldbart J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():347-350. PubMed ID: 28873821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.