These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31013170)

  • 21. Effect of automated versus manual emergency braking on rear seat adult and pediatric occupant precrash motion.
    Graci V; Douglas E; Seacrist T; Kerrigan J; Mansfield J; Bolte J; Sherony R; Hallman J; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S106-S111. PubMed ID: 31381438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of belt pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear-impact sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22239146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk of concussion due to head acceleration in rear impact sled tests of passenger automobile seats.
    Courtney A; Campbell IC; Courtney E; Pasquesi SA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S133-S135. PubMed ID: 30841805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Muscle activity during low-speed rear impact.
    Olive O; Marianne M; Henry PM; Hung-Kay CD
    Chin J Traumatol; 2019 Apr; 22(2):80-84. PubMed ID: 30962127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical evaluation of exoskeleton use on loading of the lumbar spine.
    Weston EB; Alizadeh M; Knapik GG; Wang X; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():101-108. PubMed ID: 29409622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Muscle activity influence on the kinematics of the cervical spine in frontal tests.
    Dehner C; Schick S; Kraus M; Scola A; Hell W; Kramer M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(6):607-13. PubMed ID: 23859764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of retractor and anchor pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Burnett RA; Miller GA; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):396-400. PubMed ID: 33886404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of lumbar spine posture on thoracic spine motion and muscle activation patterns.
    Nairn BC; Drake JD
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Oct; 37():1-11. PubMed ID: 25026559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of unstable shoes on trunk muscle activity and lumbar spine kinematics.
    Lisón JF; Pérez-Soriano P; Llana-Belloch S; Sánchez-Zuriaga D; Salvador-Coloma P
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Aug; 52(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 25854301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electromyographic and kinematic exploration of whiplash-type rear impacts: effect of left offset impact.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):656-65; discussion 666-8. PubMed ID: 15541698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of sternocleidomastoid muscle in simulated low velocity rear-end impacts.
    Hernández IA; Fyfe KR; Heo G; Major PW
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):876-85. PubMed ID: 16133079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relationship between flexibility and EMG activity pattern of the erector spinae muscles during trunk flexion-extension.
    Hashemirad F; Talebian S; Hatef B; Kahlaee AH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):746-53. PubMed ID: 18400517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of trunk flexion in healthy volunteers in rear whiplash-type impacts.
    Kumar S; Ferrari R; Narayan Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Aug; 30(15):1742-9. PubMed ID: 16094276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.
    Shahvarpour A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Bazrgari B
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25476501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Partitioning the total seatback reaction force amongst the lumbar spine motion segments during simulated rear-impact collisions.
    Zehr JD; Fewster KM; Gooyers CE; Parkinson RJ; Callaghan JP
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2021 Jun; 27(2):613-619. PubMed ID: 31072236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of different rowing exercises: trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine motion, load, and stiffness.
    Fenwick CM; Brown SH; McGill SM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2009 Mar; 23(2):350-8. PubMed ID: 19197209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The in vivo dynamic response of the human spine to rapid lateral bend perturbation: effects of preload and step input magnitude.
    Chiang J; Potvin JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(13):1457-64. PubMed ID: 11458151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Midlumbar lateral flexion stability measured in healthy volunteers by in vivo fluoroscopy.
    Mellor FE; Muggleton JM; Bagust J; Mason W; Thomas PW; Breen AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E811-7. PubMed ID: 19829245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in simulated precrash events.
    Ólafsdóttir JM; Fice JB; Mang DWH; Brolin K; Davidsson J; Blouin JS; Siegmund GP
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S186-S188. PubMed ID: 29584507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.