BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31013437)

  • 1. A Systematic Narrative Review of the Evidence for Labeling of Natural Health Products and Dietary Supplements.
    Boon H; Bozinovski N
    J Altern Complement Med; 2019 Aug; 25(8):777-788. PubMed ID: 31013437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of color-coded and warning nutrition labelling schemes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Song J; Brown MK; Tan M; MacGregor GA; Webster J; Campbell NRC; Trieu K; Ni Mhurchu C; Cobb LK; He FJ
    PLoS Med; 2021 Oct; 18(10):e1003765. PubMed ID: 34610024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making sense of the "clean label" trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications.
    Asioli D; Aschemann-Witzel J; Caputo V; Vecchio R; Annunziata A; Næs T; Varela P
    Food Res Int; 2017 Sep; 99(Pt 1):58-71. PubMed ID: 28784520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
    Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
    Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and comprehensibility of over-the-counter product labels and leaflets: a narrative review.
    Tong V; Raynor DK; Aslani P
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2014 Oct; 36(5):865-72. PubMed ID: 24980281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer Understanding, Perception and Interpretation of Serving Size Information on Food Labels: A Scoping Review.
    Van der Horst K; Bucher T; Duncanson K; Murawski B; Labbe D
    Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31514395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing alternative over-the-counter medicine label formats: How do they compare when evaluated by consumers?
    Tong V; Raynor DK; Aslani P
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2018 Mar; 14(3):248-261. PubMed ID: 28546037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adult consumers' understanding and use of information on food labels: a study among consumers living in the Potchefstroom and Klerksdorp regions, South Africa.
    Jacobs SA; de Beer H; Larney M
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Mar; 14(3):510-22. PubMed ID: 20939940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Location, location, location: eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information.
    Graham DJ; Jeffery RW
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2011 Nov; 111(11):1704-11. PubMed ID: 22027053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.
    Lundeberg PJ; Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():548-556. PubMed ID: 29496604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments.
    Roseman MG; Joung HW; Littlejohn EI
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 May; 118(5):904-912. PubMed ID: 29198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' responses to health claims in the context of other on-pack nutrition information: a systematic review.
    Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Dixon H; Hughes C; Kelly B; Miller C
    Nutr Rev; 2017 Apr; 75(4):260-273. PubMed ID: 28371913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of sugar label formats on consumer understanding and amount of sugar in food choices: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Scapin T; Fernandes AC; Curioni CC; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Coyle DH; Rodrigues VM; Bernardo GL; Uggioni PL; Proença RPC
    Nutr Rev; 2021 Jun; 79(7):788-801. PubMed ID: 33313917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Public Health Issue: Dietary Supplements Promoted for Brain Health and Cognitive Performance.
    Crawford C; Boyd C; Avula B; Wang YH; Khan IA; Deuster PA
    J Altern Complement Med; 2020 Apr; 26(4):265-272. PubMed ID: 32119795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: are multiple formats a problem for consumers?
    Draper AK; Adamson AJ; Clegg S; Malam S; Rigg M; Duncan S
    Eur J Public Health; 2013 Jun; 23(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 22140250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumers' opinions on warning labels on food packages: A qualitative study in Brazil.
    de Morais Sato P; Mais LA; Khandpur N; Ulian MD; Bortoletto Martins AP; Garcia MT; Spinillo CG; Urquizar Rojas CF; Jaime PC; Scagliusi FB
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0218813. PubMed ID: 31242235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers.
    Hersey JC; Wohlgenant KC; Arsenault JE; Kosa KM; Muth MK
    Nutr Rev; 2013 Jan; 71(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23282247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When zero is greater than one: consumer misinterpretations of nutrition labels.
    Graham DJ; Mohr GS
    Health Psychol; 2014 Dec; 33(12):1579-87. PubMed ID: 24707845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.