These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31014926)

  • 1. Hypernasality in singing among children with cleft palate: a preliminary study.
    Peter S; Abdul Rahman ZA; Pillai S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 48(10):1317-1322. PubMed ID: 31014926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scaling for Assessment of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.
    Baylis A; Chapman K; Whitehill TL;
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Nov; 52(6):660-70. PubMed ID: 25322442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual Judgments of Resonance, Nasal Airflow, Understandability, and Acceptability in Speakers With Cleft Palate: Ordinal Versus Visual Analogue Scaling.
    Castick S; Knight RA; Sell D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jan; 54(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 28067575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between the perception of hypernasality and social judgments in school-aged children.
    Watterson T; Mancini M; Brancamp TU; Lewis KE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2013 Jul; 50(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 22292671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of listener training on the perceptual assessment of hypernasality.
    Oliveira AC; Scarmagnani RH; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 27191877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 and perceptual judgments of hypernasality.
    Bettens K; De Bodt M; Maryn Y; Luyten A; Wuyts FL; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():67-81. PubMed ID: 27310727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training speech pathology students in the perceptual evaluation of speech in patients with cleft palate: Reliability results and the students' perspective.
    Bruneel L; Danhieux A; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 157():111145. PubMed ID: 35468487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of Hypernasality Rating: Comparison of 3 Different Methods for Perceptual Assessment.
    Yamashita RP; Borg E; Granqvist S; Lohmander A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Sep; 55(8):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 29634363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do Adult Naïve Listeners Perceive Differences in Speech Before and After Therapy for Cleft Palate Speech Disorders? A Reliability Study of Perceptual Speech Ratings.
    Alighieri C; Meerschaert S; Van Lierde K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 67(1):116-125. PubMed ID: 37992413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability results of perceptual ratings of resonance, nasal airflow and speech acceptability in patients with cleft palate by Ugandan speech-language pathologists following a two-day workshop.
    Bruneel L; Alighieri C; D'haeseleer E; Kissel I; Adriaansen A; Sseremba D; Van Lierde K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110191. PubMed ID: 32593063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of speech disorders in children with cleft lip and palate.
    Paal S; Reulbach U; Strobel-Schwarthoff K; Nkenke E; Schuster M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Jul; 66(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 16044225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of speech sample on perceptual rating of hypernasality.
    Medeiros MN; Fukushiro AP; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2016 Jul; 0():0. PubMed ID: 27409419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of speech nasality in children with Robin Sequence.
    Prado-Oliveira R; Marques IL; Souza Ld; Souza-Brosco TV; Dutka Jde C
    Codas; 2015; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25885197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of speech rate and mouth opening on hypernasality and speech intelligibility in children with a cleft (lip and) palate.
    Alighieri C; Bettens K; Everaert J; Van Lierde K
    J Commun Disord; 2020; 83():105950. PubMed ID: 31739225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transforming assessment of speech in children with cleft palate via online crowdsourcing.
    Sescleifer AM; Francoisse CA; Webber JC; Rector JD; Lin AY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227686. PubMed ID: 31917818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Borg scale: a new method for hypernasality rating.
    Ramos-Favaretto FS; Fukushiro AP; Scarmagnani RH; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2019; 31(6):e20180296. PubMed ID: 31800882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of test stimuli for nasalance measurement in speakers of Jordanian Arabic.
    Khwaileh FA; Alfwaress FSD; Kummer AW; Alrawashdeh M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 28879790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual Anchors and the Dispersion of Nasality Ratings.
    Galek KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):423-430. PubMed ID: 27043649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.