BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31015201)

  • 1. Predictive Value of HPV Testing in Self-collected and Clinician-Collected Samples Compared with Cytology in Detecting High-grade Cervical Lesions.
    El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb WH; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1134-1140. PubMed ID: 31015201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.
    El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb W; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):491-497. PubMed ID: 29678360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
    Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
    Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different strategies for the triage to colposcopy of women tested high-risk HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples.
    Chatzistamatiou K; Tsertanidou A; Moysiadis T; Mouchtaropoulou E; Pasentsis K; Skenderi A; Stamatopoulos K; Agorastos T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 162(3):560-568. PubMed ID: 34210517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
    Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of p16(INK4a) cytology testing as an adjunct to enhance the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in human papillomavirus-positive women within an organized cervical cancer screening program.
    Gustinucci D; Passamonti B; Cesarini E; Butera D; Palmieri EA; Bulletti S; Carlani A; Staiano M; D'Amico MR; D'Angelo V; Di Dato E; Martinelli N; Malaspina M; Spita N; Tintori B; Fulciniti F
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):506-14. PubMed ID: 23075891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method.
    Zhao FH; Lewkowitz AK; Chen F; Lin MJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Ma JF; Niyazi M; Li CQ; Li SM; Smith JS; Belinson JL; Qiao YL; Castle PE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Feb; 104(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 22271765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.
    Arbyn M; Verdoodt F; Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Suonio E; Dillner L; Minozzi S; Bellisario C; Banzi R; Zhao FH; Hillemanns P; Anttila A
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Feb; 15(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 24433684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical validation of hrHPV testing on vaginal and urine self-samples in primary cervical screening (cross-sectional results from the Papillomavirus Dumfries and Galloway-PaVDaG study).
    Stanczuk G; Baxter G; Currie H; Lawrence J; Cuschieri K; Wilson A; Arbyn M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010660. PubMed ID: 27113237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus Testing on Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples in a Referral Population.
    Cho HW; Hong JH; Min KJ; Ouh YT; Seong SJ; Moon JH; Cho SH; Lee JK
    Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jul; 53(3):829-836. PubMed ID: 33421987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial.
    Polman NJ; Ebisch RMF; Heideman DAM; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM; Molijn AC; Meijer CJLM; Quint WGV; Snijders PJF; Massuger LFAG; van Kemenade FJ; Berkhof J
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 30658933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cobas 4800 HPV detection in the cervical, vaginal and urine samples of women with high-grade CIN before and after treatment.
    Stanczuk GA; Currie H; Baxter G; Foster A; Gibson L; Graham C; Cuschieri K
    J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):567-70. PubMed ID: 25878328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, Spain.
    Ibáñez R; Moreno-Crespi J; Sardà M; Autonell J; Fibla M; Gutiérrez C; Lloveras B; Alejo M; Català I; Alameda F; Casas M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
    BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 12():25. PubMed ID: 22280073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-sampling with HPV mRNA analyses from vagina and urine compared with cervical samples.
    Asciutto KC; Ernstson A; Forslund O; Borgfeldt C
    J Clin Virol; 2018 Apr; 101():69-73. PubMed ID: 29433016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 to detect high-grade cervical lesions: Results from the Screening Triage Ascertaining Intraepithelial Neoplasia by Immunostain Testing study.
    El-Zein M; Gotlieb W; Gilbert L; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jan; 148(2):492-501. PubMed ID: 32781481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of vaginal self-sampling and cervical sampling by medical professionals for the detection of HPV and CIN2+: A randomized study.
    Aarnio R; Isacson I; Sanner K; Gustavsson I; Gyllensten U; Olovsson M
    Int J Cancer; 2021 Jun; 148(12):3051-3059. PubMed ID: 33497465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical value of HPV genotyping in triage of women with high-risk-HPV-positive self-samples.
    Ebisch RM; de Kuyper-de Ridder GM; Bosgraaf RP; Massuger LF; IntHout J; Verhoef VM; Heideman DA; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ; Bulten J; Siebers AG; Bekkers RL; Melchers WJ
    Int J Cancer; 2016 Aug; 139(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 26991464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compare with physician-collected cervical samples and cytology for cervical cancer screening in developing countries?
    Bhatla N; Dar L; Patro AR; Kumar P; Kriplani A; Gulati A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR; Sreenivas V; Shah KV; Gravitt PE
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 19931499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CyclinA1 Promoter Methylation in Self-Sampling Test.
    Oranratanaphan S; Kengsakul M; Triratanachat S; Kitkumthorn N; Mutirangura A; Termrungruanglert W
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2913-2917. PubMed ID: 33112548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical performance of Anyplex II HPV28 by human papillomavirus type and viral load in a referral population.
    Baasland I; Romundstad PR; Eide ML; Jonassen CM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210997. PubMed ID: 30673759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.