373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31016502)
21. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR?
Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.
Hulten E; Ahmadi A; Blankstein R
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 25770850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
Yoon YE; Choi JH; Kim JH; Park KW; Doh JH; Kim YJ; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Gwon HC; Choe YH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Value of transluminal attenuation gradient of stress CCTA for diagnosis of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis using wide-area detector CT in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison with stress perfusion CMR.
Kim HY; Yong HS; Kim EJ; Kang EY; Seo BK
Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018; 29(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 29582878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of machine-learning CT-derived fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease in the randomized CRESCENT trials.
Nous FMA; Budde RPJ; Lubbers MM; Yamasaki Y; Kardys I; Bruning TA; Akkerhuis JM; Kofflard MJM; Kietselaer B; Galema TW; Nieman K
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3692-3701. PubMed ID: 32166492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.
Nakanishi R; Matsumoto S; Alani A; Li D; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Koo BK; Min JK; Budoff MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25904402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making.
Tesche C; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Langenbach MC; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Jochheim D; Baquet M; Bayer RR; Litwin SE; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2121-2127. PubMed ID: 29102036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease (Dan-NICAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Nissen L; Winther S; Isaksen C; Ejlersen JA; Brix L; Urbonaviciene G; Frost L; Madsen LH; Knudsen LL; Schmidt SE; Holm NR; Maeng M; Nyegaard M; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M
Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):262. PubMed ID: 27225018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CT-based total vessel plaque analyses improves prediction of hemodynamic significance lesions as assessed by fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina pectoris.
Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko B; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29866619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis.
Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.
Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Myocardial blood flow analysis of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion for hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease diagnosis: The clinical value of relative parameter optimization.
Yi Y; Xu C; Wu W; Wang Y; Li YM; Shen ZJ; Jin ZY; Wang YN
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(4):314-321. PubMed ID: 31953042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stable patients with suspected myocardial ischemia: comparison of machine-learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect myocardial ischemia.
Lossnitzer D; Klenantz S; Andre F; Goerich J; Schoepf UJ; Pazzo KL; Sommer A; Brado M; Gückel F; Sokiranski R; Becher T; Akin I; Buss SJ; Baumann S
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):34. PubMed ID: 35120459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Epicardial adipose tissue and myocardial ischemia assessed by computed tomography perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
Muthalaly RG; Nerlekar N; Wong DT; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 28089233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease.
Maaniitty T; Stenström I; Bax JJ; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Saraste A; Knuuti J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1361-1370. PubMed ID: 28528146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives.
Yang DH; Kim YH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1009-1020. PubMed ID: 28281025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
