132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31016685)
1. Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables.
Chedid G; Brambati SM; Bedetti C; Rey AE; Wilson MA; Vallet GT
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2094-2105. PubMed ID: 31016685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Norms of conceptual familiarity for 3,596 French nouns and their contribution in lexical decision.
Chedid G; Wilson MA; Bedetti C; Rey AE; Vallet GT; Brambati SM
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2238-2247. PubMed ID: 30128888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks.
Vergallito A; Petilli MA; Marelli M
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1599-1616. PubMed ID: 31950360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables.
Miklashevsky A
J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):641-661. PubMed ID: 29282595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and visual word recognition.
Bonin P; Méot A; Ferrand L; Bugaïska A
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):813-25. PubMed ID: 24993636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.
Miceli A; Wauthia E; Lefebvre L; Ris L; Simoes Loureiro I
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():667271. PubMed ID: 34177725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form.
Lynott D; Connell L
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):516-26. PubMed ID: 23055172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strength of perceptual experience predicts word processing performance better than concreteness or imageability.
Connell L; Lynott D
Cognition; 2012 Dec; 125(3):452-65. PubMed ID: 22935248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.
Peti-Stantić A; Anđel M; Gnjidić V; Keresteš G; Ljubešić N; Masnikosa I; Tonković M; Tušek J; Willer-Gold J; Stanojević MM
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1799-1816. PubMed ID: 33904142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Levels of Abstractness in Semantic Noun and Verb Processing: The Role of Sensory-Perceptual and Sensory-Motor Information.
Vonk JMJ; Obler LK; Jonkers R
J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Jun; 48(3):601-615. PubMed ID: 30603869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.
Scott GG; Keitel A; Becirspahic M; Yao B; Sereno SC
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1258-1270. PubMed ID: 30206797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words.
Repetto C; Rodella C; Conca F; Santi GC; Catricalà E
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4035-4047. PubMed ID: 36307624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tangible words are recognized faster: the grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Dicke J; Taylor SC; Gullick MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1683-91. PubMed ID: 21892884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study.
Pollock L
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1198-1216. PubMed ID: 28707214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.
Montefinese M; Gregori L; Ravelli AA; Varvara R; Radicioni DP
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0293031. PubMed ID: 37862357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.
Su IF; Yum YN; Lau DK
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2989-3008. PubMed ID: 36002627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.
Lakhzoum D; Izaute M; Ferrand L
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Jun; 53(3):1166-1178. PubMed ID: 33006067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spanish norms for affective and lexico-semantic variables for 1,400 words.
Guasch M; Ferré P; Fraga I
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1358-1369. PubMed ID: 26542969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
