These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31018279)

  • 1. Performance of the Microplate BacTrace
    D'Aoust JY; Daley E; Sewell AM
    J Food Prot; 1990 Oct; 53(10):841-845. PubMed ID: 31018279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance Assessment of the GENE-TRAK
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Greco P; Mozola MA; Colvin RE
    J Food Prot; 1995 Oct; 58(10):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 31137369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of Salmonella with the BioEnzabead
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM
    J Food Prot; 1988 Jul; 51(7):538-541. PubMed ID: 30991587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limited Sensitivity of Short (6 h) Selective Enrichment for Detection of Foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell A; Jean A
    J Food Prot; 1990 Jul; 53(7):562-565. PubMed ID: 31018367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commercial Latex Agglutination Kits for the Detection of Food borne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Greco P
    J Food Prot; 1991 Sep; 54(9):725-730. PubMed ID: 31051574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of prolonged (48 h) selective enrichment for the detection of foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Jean A
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1992; 15(1-2):121-30. PubMed ID: 1622748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Warburton DW
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1992 May; 16(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1389993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surfactants for the Effective Recovery of Salmonella in Fatty Foods.
    D'Aoust JY; Maishment C; Stotland P; Boville A
    J Food Prot; 1982 Feb; 45(3):249-252. PubMed ID: 30866284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Salmonella in dry foods using refrigerated pre-enrichment and enrichment broth cultures: interlaboratory study.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Greco P
    J AOAC Int; 1993; 76(4):814-21. PubMed ID: 8374327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ICMSF Methods Studies. XIV. Comparative Study on Recovery of Salmonella from Refrigerated Preenrichment and Enrichment Broth Cultures.
    D'Aoust JY; Beckers HJ; Boothroyd M; Mates A; McKEE CR; Moran AB; Sado P; Spain GE; Sperber WH; Vassiliadis P; Wagner DE; Wiberg C
    J Food Prot; 1983 May; 46(5):391-399. PubMed ID: 30913656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and rappaport-vassiliadis medium for recovery of Salmonella spp. from raw flesh, highly contaminated foods, and poultry feed: collaborative study.
    June GA; Sherrod PS; Hammack TS; Amaguaña RM; Andrews WH
    J AOAC Int; 1996; 79(6):1307-23. PubMed ID: 8946709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Vitek Immunodiagnostic Assay System (VIDAS) for the detection of Salmonella in foods.
    Blackburn CW; Curtis LM; Humpheson L; Petitt SB
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1994 Jul; 19(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 7765217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of the Immunodiffusion 1-2 Test™ System for Detection of Salmonella in Foods.
    D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM
    J Food Prot; 1988 Nov; 51(11):853-856. PubMed ID: 30991491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Enrichment Protocols for the 1-2Test™ for Salmonella Detection in Naturally Contaminated Foods & Feeds.
    Nath EJ; Neidert E; Randall CJ
    J Food Prot; 1989 Jul; 52(7):498-499. PubMed ID: 31003381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the BAX gel and fluorometric systems for the detection of foodborne Salmonella.
    D'Aoust JY; Pagotto F; Akhtar M; Bussey J; Cooper C; McDonald C; Meymandy M; Tyler K
    J Food Prot; 2007 Apr; 70(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 17477250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modes of inhibition of foodborne non-Salmonella bacteria by selenite cystine selective broth.
    Chen H; Fraser AD; Yamazaki H
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1994 May; 22(2-3):217-22. PubMed ID: 8074974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Stabilized Bismuth Sulfite Agar for Detection of Salmonella in Foods.
    Allen SB; Firstenberg-Eden R; Shingler DA; Bartley CB; Sullivan NM
    J Food Prot; 1993 Aug; 56(8):666-671. PubMed ID: 31113108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Salmonella Bio-EnzaBead™ Immunoassay Method and Conventional Culture Procedure for Detection of Salmonella in Crustaceans.
    Flowers RS; Chen KH; Robison BJ; Mattingly JA; Gabis DA; Silliker JH
    J Food Prot; 1987 May; 50(5):386-389. PubMed ID: 30965511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective Enrichment-Plating Conditions for Detection of Salmonella in Foods.
    D'Aoust JY
    J Food Prot; 1984 Aug; 47(8):588-590. PubMed ID: 30934402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of the Modified Semi-Solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis Agar and the Modified 1-2 Test
    Oggel JJ; Nundy DC; Zebchuk PA; Shaw SJ
    J Food Prot; 1995 Jan; 58(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 31121780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.