99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31020557)
21. Origin of eukaryotic introns: a hypothesis, based on codon distribution statistics in genes, and its implications.
Senapathy P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1986 Apr; 83(7):2133-7. PubMed ID: 3457379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. GeneBuilder: interactive in silico prediction of gene structure.
Milanesi L; D'Angelo D; Rogozin IB
Bioinformatics; 1999; 15(7-8):612-21. PubMed ID: 10487869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional eukaryotic genomic organization is strongly correlated with codon usage expression and function.
Diament A; Pinter RY; Tuller T
Nat Commun; 2014 Dec; 5():5876. PubMed ID: 25510862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Usage of the three termination codons: compilation and analysis of the known eukaryotic and prokaryotic translation termination sequences.
Kohli J; Grosjean H
Mol Gen Genet; 1981; 182(3):430-9. PubMed ID: 6946272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. GPRED-GC: a Gene PREDiction model accounting for 5
Techa-Angkoon P; Childs KL; Sun Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 15):482. PubMed ID: 31874598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. TTA Lynx: a web-based service for analysis of actinomycete genes containing rare TTA codon.
Zaburannyy N; Ostash B; Fedorenko V
Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2432-3. PubMed ID: 19574286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An integrative strategy to identify the entire protein coding potential of prokaryotic genomes by proteogenomics.
Omasits U; Varadarajan AR; Schmid M; Goetze S; Melidis D; Bourqui M; Nikolayeva O; Québatte M; Patrignani A; Dehio C; Frey JE; Robinson MD; Wollscheid B; Ahrens CH
Genome Res; 2017 Dec; 27(12):2083-2095. PubMed ID: 29141959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Indications that "codon boundaries" are physico-chemically defined and that protein-folding information is contained in the redundant exon bases.
Biro JC
Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Aug; 3():28. PubMed ID: 16893453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Integrated databases and computer systems for studying eukaryotic gene expression.
Kolchanov NA; Ponomarenko MP; Frolov AS; Ananko EA; Kolpakov FA; Ignatieva EV; Podkolodnaya OA; Goryachkovskaya TN; Stepanenko IL; Merkulova TI; Babenko VV; Ponomarenko YV; Kochetov AV; Podkolodny NL; Vorobiev DV; Lavryushev SV; Grigorovich DA; Kondrakhin YV; Milanesi L; Wingender E; Solovyev V; Overton GC
Bioinformatics; 1999; 15(7-8):669-86. PubMed ID: 10487874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Determination of eukaryotic protein coding regions using neural networks and information theory.
Farber R; Lapedes A; Sirotkin K
J Mol Biol; 1992 Jul; 226(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 1640461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative ab initio prediction of gene structures using pair HMMs.
Meyer IM; Durbin R
Bioinformatics; 2002 Oct; 18(10):1309-18. PubMed ID: 12376375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The patterns of base sequences in the nucleic acids of prokaryotes and eukaryotes reflect features of their abiotic past.
Pontes F; Rusu V; de Barros Neto B; Ferreira R
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci; 2008; 63(11-12):898-902. PubMed ID: 19227842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contextual constraints on synonymous codon choice.
Lipman DJ; Wilbur WJ
J Mol Biol; 1983 Jan; 163(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 6834430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system.
Aravind L; Koonin EV
Genome Res; 2001 Aug; 11(8):1365-74. PubMed ID: 11483577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. AUGUSTUS at EGASP: using EST, protein and genomic alignments for improved gene prediction in the human genome.
Stanke M; Tzvetkova A; Morgenstern B
Genome Biol; 2006; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11.1-8. PubMed ID: 16925833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Finding prokaryotic genes by the 'frame-by-frame' algorithm: targeting gene starts and overlapping genes.
Shmatkov AM; Melikyan AA; Chernousko FL; Borodovsky M
Bioinformatics; 1999 Nov; 15(11):874-86. PubMed ID: 10743554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A machine learning based method for the prediction of secretory proteins using amino acid composition, their order and similarity-search.
Garg A; Raghava GP
In Silico Biol; 2008; 8(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 18928201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Statistical evidence for conserved, local secondary structure in the coding regions of eukaryotic mRNAs and pre-mRNAs.
Meyer IM; Miklós I
Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(19):6338-48. PubMed ID: 16275783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. JIGSAW: integration of multiple sources of evidence for gene prediction.
Allen JE; Salzberg SL
Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(18):3596-603. PubMed ID: 16076884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer software to find genes in plant genomic DNA.
Davuluri RV; Zhang MQ
Methods Mol Biol; 2003; 236():87-108. PubMed ID: 14501060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
