These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31021115)

  • 1. Cross-modal information transfer and the effect of concurrent task-load.
    Bahrami Balani A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):104-116. PubMed ID: 31021115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory training and perceptual discrimination training impact overlapping and distinct neurocognitive processes: Evidence from event-related potentials and transfer of training gains.
    Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Shucard DW
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():50-72. PubMed ID: 30218913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning and transfer of working memory gating policies.
    Bhandari A; Badre D
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():89-100. PubMed ID: 29245108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training.
    Kattner F; Samaan L; Schubert T
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1044-1061. PubMed ID: 30805872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neurophysiological indices of the transfer of cognitive training gains to untrained tasks.
    Wang X; Covey TJ
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 May; 171():107205. PubMed ID: 32145406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Executive working memory involved in the learning of contextual cueing effect.
    Chen M; Wang C; Sclodnick B; Zhao G; Liu X
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):3059-3070. PubMed ID: 31538226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bindings in working memory: The role of object-based attention.
    Gao Z; Wu F; Qiu F; He K; Yang Y; Shen M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):533-552. PubMed ID: 27924444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is working memory storage intrinsically domain-specific?
    Uittenhove K; Chaabi L; Camos V; Barrouillet P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Nov; 148(11):2027-2057. PubMed ID: 30829525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Mastroberardino S; Spence C; Santangelo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):819-831. PubMed ID: 28345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfer after Dual n-Back Training Depends on Striatal Activation Change.
    Salminen T; Kühn S; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(39):10198-213. PubMed ID: 27683914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic imitation remains unaffected under cognitive load.
    Ramsey R; Darda KM; Downing PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):601-615. PubMed ID: 30945910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency of prospective use modulates instructed task-set interference.
    Whitehead PS; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1970-1980. PubMed ID: 30265022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective memory and working memory in comparison. New experimental paradigms.
    Fronda G; Monti C; Sozzi M; Corbo M; Balconi M
    Int J Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 130(8):834-840. PubMed ID: 31858863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory updating and binding training: Bayesian evidence supporting the absence of transfer.
    De Simoni C; von Bastian CC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jun; 147(6):829-858. PubMed ID: 29888939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent operation of implicit working memory under cognitive load.
    Ji E; Lee KM; Kim MS
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Oct; 55():214-222. PubMed ID: 28892738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration.
    Doherty JM; Belletier C; Rhodes S; Jaroslawska A; Barrouillet P; Camos V; Cowan N; Naveh-Benjamin M; Logie RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1529-1551. PubMed ID: 30407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
    Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?
    Bae GY; Luck SJ
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):268-287. PubMed ID: 30069870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.