These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31021306)

  • 41. Components of Stroop-like interference in word reading.
    La Heij W; Happel B; Mulder M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 2343768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Repetitive naming and the detection of word retrieval deficits in the beginning reader.
    Katz RB; Shankweiler D
    Cortex; 1985 Dec; 21(4):617-25. PubMed ID: 4092487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Automatic perception and synaesthesia: evidence from colour and photism naming in a stroop-negative priming task.
    Lupiáñez J; Callejas A
    Cortex; 2006 Feb; 42(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 16683494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The number of letters in number words influences the response time in numerical comparison tasks: Evidence using Korean number words.
    Kwon D; Oh S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2612-2618. PubMed ID: 31605301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Stimulus and response conflict from a second language: Stroop interference in weakly-bilingual and recently-trained languages.
    Šaban I; Schmidt JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103360. PubMed ID: 34218077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?
    Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1019-38. PubMed ID: 12421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stroop-like effects in a new-code learning task: A cognitive load theory perspective.
    Hazan-Liran B; Miller P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1878-1891. PubMed ID: 27434675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Differences between Chinese morphosyllabic and German alphabetic readers in the Stroop interference effect.
    Saalbach H; Stern E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Aug; 11(4):709-15. PubMed ID: 15581122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When canary primes yellow: effects of semantic memory on overt attention.
    Léger L; Chauvet E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):200-5. PubMed ID: 24838307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.
    Cho YS; Choi JM; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):416-29. PubMed ID: 22147533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision.
    Morrison CM; Ellis AW
    Br J Psychol; 2000 May; 91 ( Pt 2)():167-80. PubMed ID: 10832512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pupillary Stroop effects.
    Laeng B; Ørbo M; Holmlund T; Miozzo M
    Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20865297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
    Prior A; Bentin S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. About the unidirectionality of interference: insight from the musical Stroop effect.
    Grégoire L; Perruchet P; Poulin-Charronnat B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2071-89. PubMed ID: 24697690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Think the thought, walk the walk - social priming reduces the Stroop effect.
    Goldfarb L; Aisenberg D; Henik A
    Cognition; 2011 Feb; 118(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 21122833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.