These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31021674)

  • 1. Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters.
    Levi SV; Harel D; Schwartz RG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 May; 62(5):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 31021674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.
    Levi SV
    J Child Lang; 2015 Jul; 42(4):843-72. PubMed ID: 25159173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalization to unfamiliar talkers in artificial language learning.
    Finley S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Aug; 20(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 23456327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the talker recognition advantage in bilingual infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105276. PubMed ID: 34507181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning a Talker or Learning an Accent: Acoustic Similarity Constrains Generalization of Foreign Accent Adaptation to New Talkers.
    Xie X; Myers EB
    J Mem Lang; 2017 Dec; 97():30-46. PubMed ID: 28890602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Language Background on the Development of Sociolinguistic Awareness: The Perception of Accent Variation in Monolingual and Multilingual 5- to 7-Year-Old Children.
    Evans BG; Tomé Lourido G
    Phonetica; 2019; 76(2-3):142-162. PubMed ID: 31112959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Other Accent Effect in Talker Recognition: Now You See It, Now You Don't.
    Yu ME; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12986. PubMed ID: 34170043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Sommers M; Mauzé E; Barcroft J; Grantham H
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 34225318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages.
    Winters SJ; Levi SV; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4524-38. PubMed ID: 18537401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech.
    Baese-Berk MM; Bradlow AR; Wright BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):EL174-80. PubMed ID: 23464125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.