These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31021715)

  • 21. Association Between the Frequency of Glove Change and the Risk of Blood and Body Fluid Exposure in Gastrointestinal Surgery.
    Kobayashi M; Tsujimoto H; Takahata R; Einama T; Okamoto K; Kajiwara Y; Shinto E; Kishi Y; Hase K; Ueno H
    World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3695-3701. PubMed ID: 32661693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of single- versus double-gloving on virus transfer to health care workers' skin and clothing during removal of personal protective equipment.
    Casanova LM; Rutala WA; Weber DJ; Sobsey MD
    Am J Infect Control; 2012 May; 40(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 21831480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving.
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Abidi H; Fabry J
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1387-90. PubMed ID: 10583283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Double gloving: a risk reduction strategy.
    Twomey CL
    Jt Comm J Qual Saf; 2003 Jul; 29(7):369-78. PubMed ID: 12856559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.
    Guo YP; Wong PM; Li Y; Or PP
    Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 22342011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Double gloving in reducing the interoperative risk of blood borne pathogens].
    Gańczak M; Białecki P; Bohatyrewicz A
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2004; 69(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 15587381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of blood transmission through latex and nitrile glove materials.
    Mansouri M; Tidley M; Sanati KA; Roberts C
    Occup Med (Lond); 2010 May; 60(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 20097745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Barrier resistance of double layer isolation gowns.
    Kahveci Z; Kilinc-Balci FS; Yorio PL
    Am J Infect Control; 2021 Apr; 49(4):430-433. PubMed ID: 33080362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery.
    Korniewicz D; El-Masri M
    AORN J; 2012 Mar; 95(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 22381552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of double gloving with an intrinsic indicator system.
    Florman S; Burgdorf M; Finigan K; Slakey D; Hewitt R; Nichols RL
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2005; 6(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 16433603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of glove donning techniques for the likelihood of gown contamination. An infection control study.
    Newman JB; Bullock M; Goyal R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Dec; 73(6):765-71. PubMed ID: 18260491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of 4 different types of surgical gloves used for preventing blood contact.
    Wittmann A; Kralj N; Köver J; Gasthaus K; Lerch H; Hofmann F
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 May; 31(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 20334549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving glove barrier effectiveness.
    Rabussay DP; Korniewicz DM
    AORN J; 1997 Dec; 66(6):1043-6, 1049-54, 1057-60 passim. PubMed ID: 9413601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Surgical glove use in France].
    Caillot JL
    J Chir (Paris); 2005; 142(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16335895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the effect of universal use of gloves and gowns with that of glove use alone on acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a medical intensive care unit.
    Slaughter S; Hayden MK; Nathan C; Hu TC; Rice T; Van Voorhis J; Matushek M; Franklin C; Weinstein RA
    Ann Intern Med; 1996 Sep; 125(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 8779456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of double gloving to reduce surgical personnel's risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens: an integrative review.
    Childs T
    AORN J; 2013 Dec; 98(6):585-596.e6. PubMed ID: 24266931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the protective value of hospital gowns against blood strike-through and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus penetration.
    Granzow JW; Smith JW; Nichols RL; Waterman RS; Muzik AC
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Apr; 26(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9584801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a Redesigned Personal Protective Equipment Gown.
    Drews FA; Mulvey D; Stratford K; Samore MH; Mayer J
    Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Sep; 69(Suppl 3):S199-S205. PubMed ID: 31517973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of double-gloving method on prevention of surgical glove perforations and blood contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang Z; Gao X; Ruan X; Zheng B
    J Adv Nurs; 2021 Sep; 77(9):3630-3643. PubMed ID: 33733484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.
    Hentz VR; Stephanides M; Boraldi A; Tessari R; Isani R; Cadossi R; Biscione R; Massari L; Traina GC
    World J Surg; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1101-8. PubMed ID: 11571942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.