These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31021934)

  • 1. When Signals Become Crossed: Maternal-Fetal Signal Ambiguity.
    Cypher RL
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2019; 33(2):105-107. PubMed ID: 31021934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of fuzzy inference systems for classification of fetal heart rate tracings in relation to neonatal outcome.
    Czabański R; Jezewski J; Wróbel J; Sikora J; Jezewski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 23488308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does gender of the fetus have any relation with fetal heart monitoring during the first and second stage of labor?
    Yohai D; Baumfeld Y; Zilberstein T; Yaniv Salem S; Elharar D; Idan I; Mastrolia SA; Sheiner E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 27003831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal Heart Monitoring.
    Nurs Womens Health; 2015 Dec-2016 Jan; 19(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 26682665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring and poor use of partogram associated with intrapartum stillbirth: a case-referent study in Nepal.
    Kc A; Wrammert J; Clark RB; Ewald U; Målqvist M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():233. PubMed ID: 27542350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor.
    Garabedian C; De Jonckheere J; Butruille L; Deruelle P; Storme L; Houfflin-Debarge V
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 46(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 28403965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal-fetal risk assessment: a clinical guide to monitoring.
    Sokol RJ; Stojkov J; Chik L
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 22(3):547-60. PubMed ID: 487672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comment to article: fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon.
    Thoulon JM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Oct; 21(10):760. PubMed ID: 19012194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome.
    Hadar A; Sheiner E; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 11641667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
    Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Changes in the fetal heart rate during the expulsion stage. Significance of terminal bradycardia].
    Pregazzi R; Baraggino E; Mazzatenta E; Strolego F
    Minerva Ginecol; 1984; 36(1-2):7-10. PubMed ID: 6717844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J; Hayes-Gill BR; Schiermeier S; Hatzmann H; Heinrich TM; Louwen F
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abnormal fetal heart rate patterns during the active phase of labor: the value of fetal oxygen saturation.
    Vitoratos N; Salamalekis E; Saloum J; Makrakis E; Creatsas G
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Jan; 11(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 12380608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal heart rate in the second stage of labor: recording, reading, interpreting and acting.
    Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2551-4. PubMed ID: 22877246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrapartum fetal heart rate responses to maternal exercise. Case reports.
    Artal R; Khodiguian N; Paul RH
    J Perinat Med; 1993; 21(6):499-502. PubMed ID: 8006775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate tracings during the second stage of labor.
    Sheiner E; Hadar A; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 1):747-52. PubMed ID: 11339928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Goal of Continuous Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring During Labor: Have We Been Successful?
    Esplin MS
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 63(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 32516154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization and prognostic significance of variable decelerations in the second stage of labor.
    Spong CY; Rasul C; Collea JV; Eglinton GS; Ghidini A
    Am J Perinatol; 1998 Jun; 15(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 9722057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.