BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31022412)

  • 1. Disentangling specific inhibitory versus general decision-making processes during sleep deprivation using a Go/NoGo ERP paradigm.
    Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():18-27. PubMed ID: 31022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An event-related potential study of attention deficits in posttraumatic stress disorder during auditory and visual Go/NoGo continuous performance tasks.
    Shucard JL; McCabe DC; Szymanski H
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 18590795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.
    Salisbury DF; Griggs CB; Shenton ME; McCarley RW
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 15203056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.
    Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance monitoring following total sleep deprivation: effects of task type and error rate.
    Renn RP; Cote KA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 23384887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.
    Johnstone SJ; Dimoska A; Smith JL; Barry RJ; Pleffer CB; Chiswick D; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 16919346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of late positivities associated with infrequent visual events and response errors.
    Helenius P; Laasonen M; Hokkanen L; Paetau R; Niemivirta M
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):619-28. PubMed ID: 20600965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task.
    Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Violanti JM; Lee J; Shucard DW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 23528305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targets and non-targets in the aging brain: A go/nogo event-related potential study.
    Vallesi A
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 20974222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.