These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31022412)

  • 1. Disentangling specific inhibitory versus general decision-making processes during sleep deprivation using a Go/NoGo ERP paradigm.
    Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():18-27. PubMed ID: 31022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An event-related potential study of attention deficits in posttraumatic stress disorder during auditory and visual Go/NoGo continuous performance tasks.
    Shucard JL; McCabe DC; Szymanski H
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 18590795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.
    Salisbury DF; Griggs CB; Shenton ME; McCarley RW
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 15203056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.
    Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance monitoring following total sleep deprivation: effects of task type and error rate.
    Renn RP; Cote KA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 23384887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.
    Johnstone SJ; Dimoska A; Smith JL; Barry RJ; Pleffer CB; Chiswick D; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 16919346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of late positivities associated with infrequent visual events and response errors.
    Helenius P; Laasonen M; Hokkanen L; Paetau R; Niemivirta M
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):619-28. PubMed ID: 20600965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task.
    Covey TJ; Shucard JL; Violanti JM; Lee J; Shucard DW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 23528305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targets and non-targets in the aging brain: A go/nogo event-related potential study.
    Vallesi A
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 20974222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.