247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31022519)
1. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for faecal incontinence.
Simillis C; Lal N; Pellino G; Baird D; Nikolaou S; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Tekkis PP
Int J Surg; 2019 Jun; 66():37-47. PubMed ID: 31022519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Simillis C; Lal N; Qiu S; Kontovounisios C; Rasheed S; Tan E; Tekkis PP
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 33(5):645-648. PubMed ID: 29470730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-year cost-effectiveness model for non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid and dextranomer copolymer compared with sacral nerve stimulation after conservative therapy for the management of fecal incontinence.
Bernstein MA; Purdy CH; Becker A; Magar R
Clin Ther; 2014 Jun; 36(6):890-905.e3. PubMed ID: 24815061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults.
Thaha MA; Abukar AA; Thin NN; Ramsanahie A; Knowles CH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD004464. PubMed ID: 26299888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term efficacy of dextranomer in stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA/Dx) for treatment of faecal incontinence.
La Torre F; de la Portilla F
Colorectal Dis; 2013 May; 15(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 23374680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Fecal Incontinence: An Umbrella Review.
Tahmasbi F; Mosaddeghi-Heris R; Soleimanzadeh F; Ghaderpanah R; Sadrian S; Hajebrahimi S; Salehi-Pourmehr H
Neuromodulation; 2024 Feb; 27(2):229-242. PubMed ID: 37452797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the literature reporting on randomised controlled trials comparing treatments for faecal incontinence in adults.
Lal N; Simillis C; Slesser A; Kontovounisios C; Rasheed S; Tekkis PP; Tan E
Acta Chir Belg; 2019 Feb; 119(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 30644337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation vs sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a comparative case-matched study.
Al Asari S; Meurette G; Mantoo S; Kubis C; Wyart V; Lehur PA
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Nov; 16(11):O393-9. PubMed ID: 24911219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults.
Maeda Y; Laurberg S; Norton C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Feb; (2):CD007959. PubMed ID: 23450581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term efficacy of NASHA Dx injection therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence.
Mellgren A; Matzel KE; Pollack J; Hull T; Bernstein M; Graf W;
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1087-94. PubMed ID: 24837493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized clinical trial of sacral versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence.
Thin NN; Taylor SJ; Bremner SA; Emmanuel AV; Hounsome N; Williams NS; Knowles CH;
Br J Surg; 2015 Mar; 102(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 25644291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of neuromodulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence.
Thin NN; Horrocks EJ; Hotouras A; Palit S; Thaha MA; Chan CL; Matzel KE; Knowles CH
Br J Surg; 2013 Oct; 100(11):1430-47. PubMed ID: 24037562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of dextranomer in stabilised hyaluronic acid for treatment of faecal incontinence: a randomised, sham-controlled trial.
Graf W; Mellgren A; Matzel KE; Hull T; Johansson C; Bernstein M;
Lancet; 2011 Mar; 377(9770):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21420555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tibial nerve electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jin Q; Zhu Y; Yin P; Li X
Updates Surg; 2023 Aug; 75(5):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 36525234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Placebo Response Rates in Electrical Nerve Stimulation Trials for Fecal Incontinence and Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Tan K; Wells CI; Dinning P; Bissett IP; O'Grady G
Neuromodulation; 2020 Dec; 23(8):1108-1116. PubMed ID: 31889364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence.
Tan E; Ngo NT; Darzi A; Shenouda M; Tekkis PP
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2011 Mar; 26(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 21279370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sacral nerve stimulation versus percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe fecal incontinence in men.
Moya P; Parra P; Arroyo A; Peña E; Benavides J; Calpena R
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 May; 20(5):317-319. PubMed ID: 26925981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation.
Devroede G; Giese C; Wexner SD; Mellgren A; Coller JA; Madoff RD; Hull T; Stromberg K; Iyer S;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 22453321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve electrostimulation in urge urinary incontinence and faecal incontinence].
Álamo Vera V; González Oria MO; Carvajal Ramos E; Murciano Casas MP; Guillen Haynes C; García Obrero MI
Rehabilitacion (Madr); 2020; 54(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 32007180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults.
Mowatt G; Glazener C; Jarrett M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004464. PubMed ID: 17636759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
