These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31022675)

  • 1. DNA extraction from soil by EZ1 advanced XL (Qiagen).
    Barbaro A; Cormaci P; La Marca A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jun; 299():161-167. PubMed ID: 31022675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of DNA extraction using AutoMate Express™ and EZ1 advanced XL from liquid blood, bloodstains, and semen stains.
    Fujii K; Inokuchi S; Kitayama T; Nakahara H; Mizuno N; Sekiguchi K
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):981-8. PubMed ID: 23682556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extraction platform evaluations: a comparison of AutoMate Express™, EZ1® Advanced XL, and Maxwell® 16 Bench-top DNA extraction systems.
    Davis CP; King JL; Budowle B; Eisenberg AJ; Turnbough MA
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2012 Jan; 14(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 22182593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Highly efficient and automated extraction of DNA from human remains using a modified EZ1 protocol.
    Barbaro A; Samar S; Falcone G; La Marca A
    Forensic Sci Res; 2021 Jan; 6(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 34007517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing novel type of human DNA markers for forensic tissue identification: DNA copy number variation allows the detection of blood and semen.
    Zubakov D; Chamier-Ciemińska J; Kokmeijer I; Maciejewska A; Martínez P; Pawłowski R; Haas C; Kayser M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():112-118. PubMed ID: 29986230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple automated instrument for DNA extraction in forensic casework.
    Montpetit SA; Fitch IT; O'Donnell PT
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 May; 50(3):555-63. PubMed ID: 15932086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the BioRobot EZ1 in a forensic laboratory.
    Anslinger K; Bayer B; Rolf B; Keil W; Eisenmenger W
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2005 May; 7(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 15847824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a normalized extraction to further aid in fast, high-throughput processing of forensic DNA reference samples.
    Connon CC; LeFebvre AK; Benjamin RC
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():112-124. PubMed ID: 27566134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
    Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
    Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AutoMate Express™ forensic DNA extraction system for the extraction of genomic DNA from biological samples.
    Liu JY; Zhong C; Holt A; Lagace R; Harrold M; Dixon AB; Brevnov MG; Shewale JG; Hennessy LK
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1022-30. PubMed ID: 22390771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.
    Dierig L; Schmidt M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102191. PubMed ID: 31756628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of forensic storage support: DNA quality from 11-year-old saliva on FTA cards.
    Corradini B; Alù M; Magnanini E; Galinier ME; Silingardi E
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1743-1750. PubMed ID: 31463575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advancing forensic RNA typing: On non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
    van den Berge M; Bhoelai B; Harteveld J; Matai A; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():119-129. PubMed ID: 26590860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental Validation of the ANDE 6C System for Rapid DNA Analysis of Forensic Casework and DVI Samples.
    Turingan RS; Tan E; Jiang H; Brown J; Estari Y; Krautz-Peterson G; Selden RF
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1056-1071. PubMed ID: 32040208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An economical and efficient method for postmortem DNA sampling in mass fatalities.
    Mundorff AZ; Amory S; Huel R; Bilić A; Scott AL; Parsons TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():167-175. PubMed ID: 30032092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HLA DQA1 and Polymarker validations for forensic casework: standard specimens, reproducibility, and mixed specimens.
    Gross AM; Guerrieri RA
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 8914290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.