These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31024629)

  • 1. Robust Reference Powered Association Test of Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Wang Y; Li Y; Hao M; Liu X; Zhang M; Wang J; Xiong M; Shugart YY; Jin L
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():319. PubMed ID: 31024629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. TS: a powerful truncated test to detect novel disease associated genes using publicly available gWAS summary data.
    Zhang J; Guo X; Gonzales S; Yang J; Wang X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 May; 21(1):172. PubMed ID: 32366212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrate multiple traits to detect novel trait-gene association using GWAS summary data with an adaptive test approach.
    Guo B; Wu B
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(13):2251-2257. PubMed ID: 30476000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining multi-population datasets for joint genome-wide association and meta-analyses: The case of bovine milk fat composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Buitenhuis AJ; Poulsen NA; Visker MHPW; Zhang Q; van Valenberg HJF; Sun D; Bovenhuis H
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Dec; 102(12):11124-11141. PubMed ID: 31563305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.
    Pan W; Chen YM; Wei P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):306-16. PubMed ID: 25847094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biological and practical implications of genome-wide association study of schizophrenia using Bayesian variable selection.
    Rowe B; Chen X; Wang Z; Chen J; Amei A
    NPJ Schizophr; 2019 Nov; 5(1):19. PubMed ID: 31745092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating eQTL data with GWAS summary statistics in pathway-based analysis with application to schizophrenia.
    Wu C; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 42(3):303-316. PubMed ID: 29411426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of epistasis detection methods in semi-simulated GWAS.
    Chatelain C; Durand G; Thuillier V; Augé F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):231. PubMed ID: 29914375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Adaptive Association Test for Multiple Phenotypes with GWAS Summary Statistics.
    Kim J; Bai Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):651-63. PubMed ID: 26493956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bosco: Boosting Corrections for Genome-Wide Association Studies With Imbalanced Samples.
    Bao F; Deng Y; Zhao Y; Suo J; Dai Q
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2017 Jan; 16(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 28141527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replication and meta-analysis of previous genome-wide association studies confirm vezatin as the locus with the strongest evidence for association with endometriosis.
    Pagliardini L; Gentilini D; Sanchez AM; Candiani M; Viganò P; Di Blasio AM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Apr; 30(4):987-93. PubMed ID: 25678572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-wide association study identified new susceptibility loci for polycystic ovary syndrome.
    Lee H; Oh JY; Sung YA; Chung H; Kim HL; Kim GS; Cho YS; Kim JT
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):723-31. PubMed ID: 25574032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cell adhesion molecules contribute to Alzheimer's disease: multiple pathway analyses of two genome-wide association studies.
    Liu G; Jiang Y; Wang P; Feng R; Jiang N; Chen X; Song H; Chen Z
    J Neurochem; 2012 Jan; 120(1):190-8. PubMed ID: 22017384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ascertainment bias from imputation methods evaluation in wheat.
    Brandariz SP; González Reymúndez A; Lado B; Malosetti M; Garcia AA; Quincke M; von Zitzewitz J; Castro M; Matus I; Del Pozo A; Castro AJ; Gutiérrez L
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):773. PubMed ID: 27716058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Weighting sequence variants based on their annotation increases the power of genome-wide association studies in dairy cattle.
    Cai Z; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 May; 51(1):20. PubMed ID: 31077144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustification of Linear Regression and Its Application in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Alamin M; Sultana MH; Xu H; Mollah MNH
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():549. PubMed ID: 32582288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-Wide Association Analyses in the Model Rhizobium
    Epstein B; Abou-Shanab RAI; Shamseldin A; Taylor MR; Guhlin J; Burghardt LT; Nelson M; Sadowsky MJ; Tiffin P
    mSphere; 2018 Oct; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30355664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 19235185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.