170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31025912)
1. Peer Teaching Increases Knowledge and Changes Perceptions about Genetically Modified Crops in Non-Science Major Undergraduates.
Chrispeels HE; Chapman JM; Gibson CL; Muday GK
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar14. PubMed ID: 31025912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Undergraduates achieve learning gains in plant genetics through peer teaching of secondary students.
Chrispeels HE; Klosterman ML; Martin JB; Lundy SR; Watkins JM; Gibson CL; Muday GK
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(4):641-52. PubMed ID: 25452487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes on Genetically Modified Foods Among Students Studying Life Sciences.
Rathod D; Hedaoo RP
Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32744. PubMed ID: 36686112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readiness of adolescents to use genetically modified organisms according to their knowledge and emotional attitude towards GMOs.
Lachowski S; Jurkiewicz A; Choina P; Florek-Łuszczki M; Buczaj A; Goździewska M
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2017 Jun; 24(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 28664693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Food control and a citizen science approach for improving teaching of Genetics in universities.
Borrell YJ; Muñoz-Colmenero AM; Dopico E; Miralles L; Garcia-Vazquez E
Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016 Sep; 44(5):450-62. PubMed ID: 27277420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of peer teaching on nursing students: perceptions of learning environment, self-efficacy, and knowledge.
Brannagan KB; Dellinger A; Thomas J; Mitchell D; Lewis-Trabeaux S; Dupre S
Nurse Educ Today; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1440-7. PubMed ID: 23260616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Call on me! Undergraduates' perceptions of voluntarily asking and answering questions in front of large-enrollment science classes.
Nadile EM; Alfonso E; Barreiros BM; Bevan-Thomas WD; Brownell SE; Chin MR; Ferreira I; Ford SA; Gin LE; Gomez-Rosado JO; Gooding G; Heiden A; Hutt AE; King ML; Perez SG; Rivera Camacho YI; Salcedo F; Sellas CF; Sinda KA; Stahlhut KN; Stephens MD; Wiesenthal NJ; Williams KD; Zheng Y; Cooper KM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0243731. PubMed ID: 33434226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Near-peer teaching strategy in a large human anatomy course: perceptions of near-peer instructors.
Reyes-Hernández CG; Carmona Pulido JM; De la Garza Chapa RI; Serna Vázquez RP; Alcalá Briones RD; Plasencia Banda PM; Villarreal Silva EE; Jacobo Baca G; de la Garza Castro O; Elizondo Omaña RE; Guzmán López S
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25203867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning.
Evans DJ; Cuffe T
Anat Sci Educ; 2009 Oct; 2(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 19753627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reforming pathology teaching in medical college by peer-assisted learning and student-oriented interest building activities: A pilot study.
Grover S; Sood N; Chaudhary A
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2017; 30(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 28928342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees.
Burgess A; Dornan T; Clarke AJ; Menezes A; Mellis C
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 16():85. PubMed ID: 26956642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners.
Bulte C; Betts A; Garner K; Durning S
Med Teach; 2007 Sep; 29(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 17922356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.
Secomb J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):703-16. PubMed ID: 18047577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer teaching among physical therapy students during human gross anatomy: perceptions of peer teachers and students.
Youdas JW; Hoffarth BL; Kohlwey SR; Kramer CM; Petro JL
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(5):199-206. PubMed ID: 19177411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Undergraduates' lived experience of project-/problem-based learning in introductory biology.
Webster A; Metcalf A; Kelly L; Bisesi A; Marnik-Said M; Colbeck C; Marine R; Vinces M; Campbell A; Allen T
Adv Physiol Educ; 2022 Mar; 46(1):162-178. PubMed ID: 34990300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them.
Wood WB
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol; 2009; 25():93-112. PubMed ID: 19575638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating Undergraduates' Perceptions of Science in Courses Taught Using the CREATE Strategy.
Hoskins SG; Gottesman AJ
J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2018; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 29904553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Faculty Development Workshops in Student-Centered Teaching Methodologies on Faculty Members' Teaching and Their Students' Perceptions.
Tricio JA; Montt JE; Ormeño AP; Del Real AJ; Naranjo CA
J Dent Educ; 2017 Jun; 81(6):675-684. PubMed ID: 28572413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions of junior doctors and undergraduate medical students as anatomy teachers: Investigating distance along the near-peer teaching spectrum.
Hall S; Stephens J; Andrade T; Davids J; Powell M; Border S
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24170449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
