These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31027325)

  • 21. [Polymeric hearing protectors in sport shooting].
    Lwow F; Szmigiero L
    Polim Med; 2007; 37(3):21-9. PubMed ID: 18251202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Noise attenuation of communication hearing protectors against impulses from assault rifle.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S
    Mil Med; 1998 Jan; 163(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9465571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Hearing and Head Protection on the Localization of Tonal and Broadband Reverse Alarms.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Marleau C; Cadieux MF; Laprise-Girard K; Gula E; Carroll V; Bibeau M; Nélisse H
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1105-1120. PubMed ID: 33596712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of earmuffs in protecting hearing during shooting practice: a case-study.
    Rawool VW; Campbell C
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):545-552. PubMed ID: 29490517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevention of acute acoustic trauma by earmuffs during military training.
    Dhammadejsakdi N; Boonyanukul S; Jaruchinda S; Aramrattana A; Eiumtrakul S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Feb; 92 Suppl 1():S1-6. PubMed ID: 21302411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
    Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aspects on personal noise protection.
    Axelsson K; Axelsson A; Jonsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 756091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
    Savell JF; Toothman EH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
    Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.
    Murphy WJ; Fackler CJ; Berger EH; Shaw PB; Stergar M
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):364-73. PubMed ID: 26356380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impulse noise and hand-arm vibration in relation to sensory neural hearing loss.
    Starck J; Pekkarinen J; Pyykkö I
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1988 Aug; 14(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 3175560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing the alternatives for the most favourable personal protective equipment.
    Seçkiner SU; Ünal H
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2021 Sep; 27(3):921-927. PubMed ID: 31609158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effect of earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 3687731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of coldness on the protective performance of earmuffs.
    Starck J; Toppila E; Laitinen H
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):47-53. PubMed ID: 16053605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.