193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31027713)
1. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling.
Branscum AJ; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
Prev Vet Med; 2005 May; 68(2-4):145-63. PubMed ID: 15820113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.
Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():37-47. PubMed ID: 28237234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a new bead-based antibody detection test to reveal Toxoplasma gondii infections in pig populations.
Bokken GC; Portengen L; Cornelissen JB; Bergwerff AA; van Knapen F
Vet Parasitol; 2015 Jan; 207(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 25529142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach for estimating values for prevalence and diagnostic test characteristics of porcine cysticercosis.
Dorny P; Phiri IK; Vercruysse J; Gabriel S; Willingham AL; Brandt J; Victor B; Speybroeck N; Berkvens D
Int J Parasitol; 2004 Apr; 34(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15064121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests.
Nérette P; Stryhn H; Dohoo I; Hammell L
Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jul; 85(3-4):207-25. PubMed ID: 18355935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.
van Smeden M; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; de Groot JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 179(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 24272278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
Menten J; Lesaffre E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26315894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.
Enøe C; Georgiadis MP; Johnson WO
Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 10802334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
Valenstein PN
Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to Determine the Accuracy of an Alternative Diagnostic Test when It Is Actually Better than the Reference Tests: A Re-Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Scrub Typhus Using Bayesian LCMs.
Lim C; Paris DH; Blacksell SD; Laongnualpanich A; Kantipong P; Chierakul W; Wuthiekanun V; Day NP; Cooper BS; Limmathurotsakul D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0114930. PubMed ID: 26024375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
