These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31027962)

  • 21. Maximum dislodging forces of mandibular implant-assisted removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment.
    Gharehchahi J; Asadzadeh N; Mirmortazavi A; Shakeri MT
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):543-549. PubMed ID: 23551954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24278931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of Denture Cleansing Solutions on the Retention of Locator Attachments Over Time.
    Ayyıldız S; Şahin C; Emir F; Ersu B
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 31943512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of interimplant divergence on the retention characteristics of locator attachments, a laboratory study.
    Stephens GJ; di Vitale N; O'Sullivan E; McDonald A
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 24750293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retention of implant-supported overdentures at different implant angulations: comparing Locator and ball attachments.
    Sultana N; Bartlett DW; Suleiman M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1406-1410. PubMed ID: 28191678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention of Different Attachment Systems for Digitally Designed Mandibular Implant Overdenture.
    Abdelaziz MS; Fawzy AM; Ghali RM; Nassar HI
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 35344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The
    Kurtulus IL; Gurbulak AG
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):639-644. PubMed ID: 29735866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of pink locator attachments after multiple pulls: an in vitro study.
    You W; Masri R; Romberg E; Driscoll CF; You T
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 21777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations.
    Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.