427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31029133)
1. Deviations in palatal region between indirect and direct digital models: an in vivo study.
Zhongpeng Y; Tianmin X; Ruoping J
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):66. PubMed ID: 31029133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the influence of palate scanning on the accuracy of complete-arch digital impressions-An in vitro study.
Schmalzl J; Keskeny GÁ; Hermann P; Pál A; Géczi Z; Borbély J; Róth I
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105014. PubMed ID: 38648874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner.
Müller P; Ender A; Joda T; Katsoulis J
Quintessence Int; 2016 Apr; 47(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 26824085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla.
Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning.
Deferm JT; Schreurs R; Baan F; Bruggink R; Merkx MAW; Xi T; Bergé SJ; Maal TJJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 28983706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience.
Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques.
Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance.
Atieh MA; Ritter AV; Ko CC; Duqum I
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28222869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method.
Nagy Z; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans Z; Renne W; Vág J
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32264943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns.
Pattamavilai S; Ongthiemsak C
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 35256181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
