BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31029261)

  • 1. Adaptive hysteresis thresholding segmentation technique for localizing the breast masses in the curve stitching domain.
    Mughal B; Muhammad N; Sharif M
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jun; 126():26-34. PubMed ID: 31029261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection and Segmentation of Pectoral Muscle on MLO-View Mammogram Using Enhancement Filter.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2017 Oct; 41(12):190. PubMed ID: 29071592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.
    Shen R; Yan K; Xiao F; Chang J; Jiang C; Zhou K
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):680-691. PubMed ID: 29582242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust method for segmenting pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammograms.
    Yin K; Yan S; Song C; Zheng B
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):237-248. PubMed ID: 30288698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic Detection of Pectoral Muscle Region for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Using MIAS Mammograms.
    Yoon WB; Oh JE; Chae EY; Kim HH; Lee SY; Kim KG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5967580. PubMed ID: 27847817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel automatic suspicious mass regions identification using Havrda & Charvat entropy and Otsu's N thresholding.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 May; 114(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 24681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pectoral muscle segmentation: a review.
    Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua KC; Min LC; Abraham KT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23270962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of pectoral muscle based on topographic map and shape-shifting silhouette.
    Mughal B; Muhammad N; Sharif M; Rehman A; Saba T
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(1):778. PubMed ID: 30068304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.
    Mustra M; Grgic M; Rangayyan RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jul; 54(7):1003-24. PubMed ID: 26546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):562-80. PubMed ID: 19816741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fully automated breast boundary and pectoral muscle segmentation in mammograms.
    Rampun A; Morrow PJ; Scotney BW; Winder J
    Artif Intell Med; 2017 Jun; 79():28-41. PubMed ID: 28606722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram.
    Maitra IK; Nag S; Bandyopadhyay SK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21669471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.
    Bora VB; Kothari AG; Keskar AG
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26259521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical pipeline for breast boundary segmentation and calcification detection in mammograms.
    Shi P; Zhong J; Rampun A; Wang H
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():178-188. PubMed ID: 29597143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient and shape based feature.
    Chakraborty J; Mukhopadhyay S; Singla V; Khandelwal N; Bhattacharyya P
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Jun; 25(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 22006275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms.
    Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 12(3):3285. PubMed ID: 21844845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic pectoral muscle segmentation on mediolateral oblique view mammograms.
    Kwok SM; Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y; Rickard MT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 15377122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.