These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31029868)

  • 1. The impact of improved MEG-MRI co-registration on MEG connectivity analysis.
    Chella F; Marzetti L; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L; Ilmoniemi RJ; Romani GL; Pizzella V
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():354-367. PubMed ID: 31029868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consistency of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity and network reconstruction using a template versus native MRI for co-registration.
    Douw L; Nieboer D; Stam CJ; Tewarie P; Hillebrand A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Jan; 39(1):104-119. PubMed ID: 28990264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating functional connectivity using 2D tangential components in MEG sensor space.
    Kim MY; Kwon H; Lim S; Lee YH; Kim JW; Kim K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():64-75. PubMed ID: 26393280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.
    Molins A; Stufflebeam SM; Brown EN; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Sep; 42(3):1069-77. PubMed ID: 18602485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid ultra-low-field MRI and magnetoencephalography system based on a commercial whole-head neuromagnetometer.
    Vesanen PT; Nieminen JO; Zevenhoven KC; Dabek J; Parkkonen LT; Zhdanov AV; Luomahaara J; Hassel J; Penttilä J; Simola J; Ahonen AI; Mäkelä JP; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1795-804. PubMed ID: 22807201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic Spatial Calibration of Ultra-Low-Field MRI for High-Accuracy Hybrid MEG-MRI.
    Makinen AJ; Zevenhoven KCJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1317-1327. PubMed ID: 30908195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimized 3D co-registration of ultra-low-field and high-field magnetic resonance images.
    Guidotti R; Sinibaldi R; De Luca C; Conti A; Ilmoniemi RJ; Zevenhoven KCJ; Magnelind PE; Pizzella V; Del Gratta C; Romani GL; Della Penna S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193890. PubMed ID: 29509780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microtesla MRI of the human brain combined with MEG.
    Zotev VS; Matlashov AN; Volegov PL; Savukov IM; Espy MA; Mosher JC; Gomez JJ; Kraus RH
    J Magn Reson; 2008 Sep; 194(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18619876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High precision anatomy for MEG.
    Troebinger L; López JD; Lutti A; Bradbury D; Bestmann S; Barnes G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():583-91. PubMed ID: 23911673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposal for a new MEG-MRI co-registration: a 3D laser scanner system.
    Hironaga N; Hagiwara K; Ogata K; Hayamizu M; Urakawa T; Tobimatsu S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 125(12):2404-12. PubMed ID: 24813089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the Test-Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity.
    Garcés P; Martín-Buro MC; Maestú F
    Brain Connect; 2016 Jul; 6(6):448-60. PubMed ID: 27212454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI.
    Brookes MJ; Hale JR; Zumer JM; Stevenson CM; Francis ST; Barnes GR; Owen JP; Morris PG; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1082-104. PubMed ID: 21352925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flexible head-casts for high spatial precision MEG.
    Meyer SS; Bonaiuto J; Lim M; Rossiter H; Waters S; Bradbury D; Bestmann S; Brookes M; Callaghan MF; Weiskopf N; Barnes GR
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Jan; 276():38-45. PubMed ID: 27887969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: an atlas-based MEG beamformer solution.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR; Bosboom JL; Berendse HW; Stam CJ
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):3909-21. PubMed ID: 22122866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase shift invariant imaging of coherent sources (PSIICOS) from MEG data.
    Ossadtchi A; Altukhov D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():950-971. PubMed ID: 30142449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.