170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31031035)
1. A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1603-1616. PubMed ID: 31031035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3D quantitative breast ultrasound analysis for differentiating fibroadenomas and carcinomas smaller than 1cm.
Meel-van den Abeelen AS; Weijers G; van Zelst JC; Thijssen JM; Mann RM; de Korte CL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():141-147. PubMed ID: 28189199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.
Xu H; Rao M; Varghese T; Sommer A; Baker S; Hall TJ; Sisney GA; Burnside ES
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1813-24. PubMed ID: 20800948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of breast tumor response to chemotherapy using a multi-parameter approach.
Tadayyon H; Sannachi L; Gangeh M; Sadeghi-Naini A; Tran W; Trudeau ME; Pritchard K; Ghandi S; Verma S; Czarnota GJ
Oncotarget; 2016 Jul; 7(29):45094-45111. PubMed ID: 27105515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative ultrasound characterization of locally advanced breast cancer by estimation of its scatterer properties.
Tadayyon H; Sadeghi-Naini A; Wirtzfeld L; Wright FC; Czarnota G
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):012903. PubMed ID: 24387530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of benign and malignant breast tumors by 2-d analysis based on contour description and scatterer characterization.
Tsui PH; Liao YY; Chang CC; Kuo WH; Chang KJ; Yeh CK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):513-22. PubMed ID: 20129851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of combined BI-RADS analysis and Nakagami statistics of ultrasound echoes in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Dobruch-Sobczak K; Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H; Roszkowska-Purska K; Nowicki A; Jakubowski W
Clin Radiol; 2017 Apr; 72(4):339.e7-339.e15. PubMed ID: 28038779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small breast lesion classification performance using the normalized axial-shear strain area feature.
Thittai AK; Yamal JM; Ophir J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Mar; 39(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 23312961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Radiomics Approach for the Classification of Fibroepithelial Lesions on Breast Ultrasonography.
Sim Y; Lee SE; Kim EK; Kim S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 May; 46(5):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 32102739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Distinguishing Small Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From Fibroadenoma.
Yeo SH; Kim GR; Lee SH; Moon WK
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 29424448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-Frequency Quantitative Ultrasound for Imaging Prostate Cancer Using a Novel Micro-Ultrasound Scanner.
Rohrbach D; Wodlinger B; Wen J; Mamou J; Feleppa E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1341-1354. PubMed ID: 29627083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifact reduction of ultrasound Nakagami imaging by combining multifocus image reconstruction and the noise-assisted correlation algorithm.
Tsui PH; Tsai YW
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 24626567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative ultrasonic characterization of diffuse scatterers in the presence of structures that produce coherent echoes.
Luchies AC; Ghoshal G; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 May; 59(5):893-904. PubMed ID: 22622974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved diagnostics through quantitative ultrasound imaging.
Hruska DP; Sanchez J; Oelze ML
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1956-9. PubMed ID: 19964021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution.
Shankar PM; Dumane VA; Reid JM; Genis V; Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Goldberg BB
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Mar; 48(2):569-80. PubMed ID: 11370371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of radiomics on the breast ultrasound radiologist's clinical practice: From lumpologist to data wrangler.
Fleury EFC; Marcomini K
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109197. PubMed ID: 32795725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrimination of breast tumors in ultrasonic images using an ensemble classifier based on the AdaBoost algorithm with feature selection.
Takemura A; Shimizu A; Hamamoto K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):598-609. PubMed ID: 20199907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
