219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31031578)
1. Cerebellar Lobules Optimal Stimulation (CLOS): A Computational Pipeline to Optimize Cerebellar Lobule-Specific Electric Field Distribution.
Rezaee Z; Dutta A
Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():266. PubMed ID: 31031578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A computational pipeline to find lobule-specific electric field distribution during non-invasive cerebellar stimulation.
Rezaee Z; Ruszala B; Dutta A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1191-1196. PubMed ID: 31374791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lobule-Specific Dosage Considerations for Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Healthy Aging: A Computational Modeling Study Using Age-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging Templates.
Rezaee Z; Dutta A
Neuromodulation; 2020 Apr; 23(3):341-365. PubMed ID: 31995268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Dentate Nucleus to Facilitate Standing Balance in Chronic Stroke Survivors-A Pilot Study.
Rezaee Z; Kaura S; Solanki D; Dash A; Srivastava MVP; Lahiri U; Dutta A
Brain Sci; 2020 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32050704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the feasibility of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation to facilitate post-stroke overground gait performance in chronic stroke: a partial least-squares regression approach.
Solanki D; Rezaee Z; Dutta A; Lahiri U
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jan; 18(1):18. PubMed ID: 33509192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation.
Batsikadze G; Rezaee Z; Chang DI; Gerwig M; Herlitze S; Dutta A; Nitsche MA; Timmann D
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 31040077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia.
Galletta EE; Cancelli A; Cottone C; Simonelli I; Tecchio F; Bikson M; Marangolo P
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26198364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS): A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease.
Grimaldi G; Argyropoulos GP; Bastian A; Cortes M; Davis NJ; Edwards DJ; Ferrucci R; Fregni F; Galea JM; Hamada M; Manto M; Miall RC; Morales-Quezada L; Pope PA; Priori A; Rothwell J; Tomlinson SP; Celnik P
Neuroscientist; 2016 Feb; 22(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 25406224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of transcranial stimulating electrode montages over the head for lower-extremity transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring.
Tomio R; Akiyama T; Ohira T; Yoshida K
J Neurosurg; 2017 Jun; 126(6):1951-1958. PubMed ID: 27662531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How structural and functional MRI can inform dual-site tACS parameters: A case study in a clinical population and its pragmatic implications.
Soleimani G; Kupliki R; Bodurka J; Paulus MP; Ekhtiari H
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 35042056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Group-level and functional-region analysis of electric-field shape during cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation with different electrode montages.
Gomez-Tames J; Asai A; Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Uehara S; Otaka Y; Hirata A
J Neural Eng; 2019 Jun; 16(3):036001. PubMed ID: 30808008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Cathode Location and the Size of Anode on Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Leg Motor Area in Healthy Humans.
Foerster ÁS; Rezaee Z; Paulus W; Nitsche MA; Dutta A
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():443. PubMed ID: 30022928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interindividual differences in posterior fossa morphometry affect cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength.
Maas RPPWM; Faber J; ; van de Warrenburg BPC; Schutter DJLG
Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Sep; 153():152-165. PubMed ID: 37499446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.
Klaus J; Schutter DJLG
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22183. PubMed ID: 34773062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of head model extent on electric field predictions in transcranial current stimulation.
Callejón-Leblic MA; Miranda PC
J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33647895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.
Edwards D; Cortes M; Datta A; Minhas P; Wassermann EM; Bikson M
Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():266-75. PubMed ID: 23370061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value and cost of complexity in predictive modelling: role of tissue anisotropic conductivity and fibre tracts in neuromodulation.
Shahid SS; Bikson M; Salman H; Wen P; Ahfock T
J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036002. PubMed ID: 24737098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Focal Hemodynamic Responses in the Stimulated Hemisphere During High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Muthalib M; Besson P; Rothwell J; Perrey S
Neuromodulation; 2018 Jun; 21(4):348-354. PubMed ID: 28714545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
