141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31031854)
1. Does Lymphadenectomy with at Least 15 Perigastric Lymph Nodes Retrieval Promise an Improved Survival for Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Southern China.
Ye J; Ren Y; Dai W; Chen J; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
J Cancer; 2019; 10(6):1444-1452. PubMed ID: 31031854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis.
Pan S; Wang P; Xing Y; Li K; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhu Z
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Sep; 39(1):49. PubMed ID: 31519217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Necessity of harvesting at least 25 lymph nodes in patients with stage N2-N3 resectable gastric cancer: a 10-year, single-institution cohort study.
Chen HN; Chen XZ; Zhang WH; Chen XL; Yang K; Liu JP; Zhang B; Chen ZX; Chen JP; Zhou ZG; Hu JK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Mar; 94(10):e620. PubMed ID: 25761190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perigastric lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: comparison of different staging systems.
de Manzoni G; Verlato G; di Leo A; Guglielmi A; Laterza E; Ricci F; Cordiano C
Gastric Cancer; 1999 Dec; 2(4):201-205. PubMed ID: 11957098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harvest of at Least 23 Lymph Nodes is Indispensable for Stage N3 Gastric Cancer Patients.
Zheng G; Feng F; Guo M; Xu G; Liu S; Liu Z; Sun L; Hong L; Yang J; Lian X; Fan D; Zhang H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):998-1002. PubMed ID: 27830390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a Higher Cutoff Value of Lymph Node Retrieval Substantially Improve Survival in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer?-Time to Embrace a New Digit.
Liu YY; Fang WL; Wang F; Hsu JT; Tsai CY; Liu KH; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
Oncologist; 2017 Jan; 22(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 27789777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of perigastric lymph nodes metastases on survival in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.
Wu ZY; Yu JC; Xu LY; Shen JH; Wu JZ; Wang SH; Fu JH; Fan YH; Yang BN; Shen ZY; Huang Q; Li EM
Dis Esophagus; 2010 Jan; 23(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 19392853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of total number of harvested lymph nodes on survival outcomes after curative resection for gastric adenocarcinoma: findings from an eastern high-volume gastric cancer center.
Macalindong SS; Kim KH; Nam BH; Ryu KW; Kubo N; Kim JY; Eom BW; Yoon HM; Kook MC; Choi IJ; Kim YW
BMC Cancer; 2018 Jan; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29329569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists.
Jiang L; Yao Z; Zhang Y; Hu J; Zhao D; Zhai H; Wang X; Zhang Z; Wang D
Chin J Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 28(5):511-518. PubMed ID: 27877010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of inadequate lymph node staging in resectable gastric cancer: a contemporary analysis using the National Cancer Data Base.
Datta J; Lewis RS; Mamtani R; Stripp D; Kelz RR; Drebin JA; Fraker DL; Karakousis GC; Roses RE
Cancer; 2014 Sep; 120(18):2855-65. PubMed ID: 24854027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The retrieval of at least 25 lymph nodes should be essential for advanced gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: A retrospective analysis of single-institution database study design: Cohort study.
Zhao B; Zhang J; Chen X; Sun T; Wang Z; Xu H; Huang B
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():291-299. PubMed ID: 29191408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting number of lymph nodes harvested and the impact of examining a minimum of 12 lymph nodes in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective single institution cohort study of 1167 consecutive patients.
Tsai HL; Huang CW; Yeh YS; Ma CJ; Chen CW; Lu CY; Huang MY; Yang IP; Wang JY
BMC Surg; 2016 Apr; 16():17. PubMed ID: 27079509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perigastric lymph node status as a prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer.
Adachi Y; Suematsu T; Shiraishi N; Tanimura H; Morimoto A; Kitano S
Br J Surg; 1998 Sep; 85(9):1281-4. PubMed ID: 9752878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival Analysis with Extended Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Removing Stage Migration from the Equation.
Vuong B; Graff-Baker AN; Dehal A; Stern S; Fujita M; Goldfarb M; Bilchik AJ
Am Surg; 2017 Oct; 83(10):1074-1079. PubMed ID: 29391098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the anatomical location and the number of metastatic lymph nodes on gastric cancer patient´s survival.
Duchon R; Bernadic M; Pindak D
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2020; 121(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 32356438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes confer an improved survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer?
Kim YI
J Gastric Cancer; 2014 Jun; 14(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 25061538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perigastric lymph nodes with metastasis in gastric cancer.
Yu W; Kim HS; Choi GS; Suh IS
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(28):2658-61. PubMed ID: 10522060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Number of Lymph Nodes Removed and Survival after Gastric Cancer Resection: An Analysis from the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative.
Gholami S; Janson L; Worhunsky DJ; Tran TB; Squires MH; Jin LX; Spolverato G; Votanopoulos KI; Schmidt C; Weber SM; Bloomston M; Cho CS; Levine EA; Fields RC; Pawlik TM; Maithel SK; Efron B; Norton JA; Poultsides GA
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Aug; 221(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 26206635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gastric carcinoma: does lymph node dissection alter survival?
Wanebo HJ; Kennedy BJ; Winchester DP; Fremgen A; Stewart AK
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Dec; 183(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 8957465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
