These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31031984)

  • 21. How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes.
    Coutrot A; Guyader N
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):5. PubMed ID: 24993019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task.
    Nuthmann A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):370-392. PubMed ID: 27480268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gaze Toward Naturalistic Social Scenes by Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Implications for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Designs.
    Liang J; Wilkinson K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1157-1170. PubMed ID: 29710313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Don't be fooled! Attentional responses to social cues in a face-to-face and video magic trick reveals greater top-down control for overt than covert attention.
    Kuhn G; Teszka R; Tenaw N; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():136-42. PubMed ID: 26407341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring social attention and motivation in autism spectrum disorder using eye-tracking: Stimulus type matters.
    Chevallier C; Parish-Morris J; McVey A; Rump KM; Sasson NJ; Herrington JD; Schultz RT
    Autism Res; 2015 Oct; 8(5):620-8. PubMed ID: 26069030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes.
    Jansen L; Onat S; König P
    J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):29.1-19. PubMed ID: 19271899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration.
    Hartmann M; Sommer NR; Diana L; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Feb; 129():40-48. PubMed ID: 30471991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective Changes in Complexity of Visual Scanning for Social Stimuli in Infancy.
    Tomalski P; López Pérez D; Radkowska A; Malinowska-Korczak A
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():705600. PubMed ID: 34795610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Observers' cognitive states modulate how visual inputs relate to gaze control.
    Kardan O; Henderson JM; Yourganov G; Berman MG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1429-42. PubMed ID: 27123677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model.
    Cerf M; Frady EP; Koch C
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):10.1-15. PubMed ID: 20053101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.
    Peacock CE; Hayes TR; Henderson JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102889. PubMed ID: 31302302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Defending Yarbus: eye movements reveal observers' task.
    Borji A; Itti L
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):29. PubMed ID: 24665092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search.
    Torralba A; Oliva A; Castelhano MS; Henderson JM
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Oct; 113(4):766-86. PubMed ID: 17014302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes.
    Birmingham E; Bischof WF; Kingstone A
    Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2992-3000. PubMed ID: 19782100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.
    Tatler BW
    J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):4.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers.
    Helo A; van Ommen S; Pannasch S; Danteny-Dordoigne L; Rämä P
    Infant Behav Dev; 2017 Nov; 49():248-266. PubMed ID: 29028583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of social and symbolic cues on observers' gaze behaviour.
    Hermens F; Walker R
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 107(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 26582135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Naturalistic viewing conditions can increase task engagement and aesthetic preference but have only minimal impact on EEG quality.
    Welke D; Vessel EA
    Neuroimage; 2022 Aug; 256():119218. PubMed ID: 35443219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduced modulation of scanpaths in response to task demands in posterior cortical atrophy.
    Shakespeare TJ; Pertzov Y; Yong KX; Nicholas J; Crutch SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():190-200. PubMed ID: 25596316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disentangling bottom-up versus top-down and low-level versus high-level influences on eye movements over time.
    Schütt HH; Rothkegel LOM; Trukenbrod HA; Engbert R; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2019 Mar; 19(3):1. PubMed ID: 30821809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.