These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31033320)

  • 1. Simultaneous underweighting and overestimation of rare events: Unpacking a paradox.
    Szollosi A; Liang G; Konstantinidis E; Donkin C; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2207-2217. PubMed ID: 31033320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)?
    Ungemach C; Chater N; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 19399978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rare and extreme outcomes in risky choice.
    Mason A; Ludvig EA; Spetch ML; Madan CR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Jun; 31(3):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 37973763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty information that is irrelevant for report impacts confidence judgments.
    Spence ML; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1981-1994. PubMed ID: 30475052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A behavioral demonstration of overconfidence in judgment.
    Mannes AE; Moore DA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1190-7. PubMed ID: 23722982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Best, second-best, and good-enough explanations: How they matter to reasoning.
    Douven I; Mirabile P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1792-1813. PubMed ID: 29389197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails.
    Oral B; Dragicevic P; Telea A; Dimara E
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Oct; 30(10):6928-6940. PubMed ID: 38145516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is social decision making for close others consistent across domains and within individuals?
    Guassi Moreira JF; Tashjian SM; Galván A; Silvers JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1509-1526. PubMed ID: 31804124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources.
    Lieder F; Griffiths TL; Hsu M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 29035078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Yielding to desire: the durability of affective preferences.
    Rapp DN; Jacovina ME; Slaten DG; Krause E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1419-31. PubMed ID: 24933694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overestimating the valuations and preferences of others.
    Jung MH; Moon A; Nelson LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1193-1214. PubMed ID: 31750709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consider the alternative: The effects of causal knowledge on representing and using alternative hypotheses in judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):723-39. PubMed ID: 26569437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Explaining the persistent influence of facial cues in social decision-making.
    Jaeger B; Evans AM; Stel M; van Beest I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jun; 148(6):1008-1021. PubMed ID: 31070393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Over- and underweighting of extreme values in decisions from sequential samples.
    Clarmann von Clarenau V; Appelhoff S; Pachur T; Spitzer B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Mar; 153(3):814-826. PubMed ID: 38271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The devil is in the specificity: the negative effect of prediction specificity on prediction accuracy.
    Yoon SO; Suk K; Goo JK; Lee J; Lee SM
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 23660410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal beliefs and empirical evidence.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely E; Maldonado A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 21310692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lay beliefs about the controllability of everyday mental states.
    Cusimano C; Goodwin GP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1701-1732. PubMed ID: 30730195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expectations affect physical causation judgments.
    Gerstenberg T; Icard T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 31512904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judgment and Decision Making.
    Fischhoff B; Broomell SB
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():331-355. PubMed ID: 31337275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.