124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31033755)
1. Cranial Base Superimposition of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Voxel-Based Protocol Validation.
Haas Junior OL; Guijarro-Martínez R; Sousa Gil AP; Méndez-Manjón I; Valls-Otañón A; de Oliveira RB; Hernández-Alfaro F
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1809-1814. PubMed ID: 31033755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition.
Bazina M; Cevidanes L; Ruellas A; Valiathan M; Quereshy F; Syed A; Wu R; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 29602352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard-tissue outcomes.
Häner ST; Kanavakis G; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 31529585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear measurements of sinus floor elevation based on voxel-based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography images.
Huang J; Hu J; Luo R; Xie S; Wang Z; Ye Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 31392828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.
Eliliwi M; Bazina M; Palomo JM
Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 31549857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of voxel- and surface-based cone-beam computed tomography mandibular superimposition in adult orthodontic patients.
Han G; Li J; Wang S; Wang L; Zhou Y; Liu Y
J Int Med Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):300060520982708. PubMed ID: 33459090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations.
Andriola FO; Haas Junior OL; Guijarro-Martínez R; Hernández-Alfaro F; Oliveira RB; Pagnoncelli RM; Swennen GR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Mar; 51(3):20210340. PubMed ID: 34520241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast three-dimensional superimposition of cone beam computed tomography for orthopaedics and orthognathic surgery evaluation.
Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Koerich L; Pham J; Cevidanes LH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1188-96. PubMed ID: 25935632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images with surface-based registration in growing patients.
Tai K; Park JH; Mishima K; Hotokezaka H
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 20831142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Koerich L; Burns D; Weissheimer A; Claus JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 26794399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voxel-based superimposition of Cone Beam CT scans for orthodontic and craniofacial follow-up: Overview and clinical implementation.
Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Salmon B
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):739-748. PubMed ID: 33011138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement error and reliability of three available 3D superimposition methods in growing patients.
Ponce-Garcia C; Ruellas ACO; Cevidanes LHS; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Lagravere-Vich M
Head Face Med; 2020 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 31987041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial cone-beam computed tomographies for facial soft tissue assessment: Reproducibility and segmentation effects.
Kanavakis G; Häner ST; Matthey F; Gkantidis N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):343-351.e1. PubMed ID: 33641815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches.
Nada RM; Maal TJ; Breuning KH; Bergé SJ; Mostafa YA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16520. PubMed ID: 21347419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a windowing protocol for accurate in vivo tooth segmentation using i-CAT cone beam computed tomography.
Rastegar B; Thumilaire B; Odri GA; Siciliano S; Zapała J; Mahy P; Olszewski R
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 29999253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional mandibular superimposition techniques against Björk's structural superimposition method.
Franco CS; Sexton C; Flores-Mir C; Healey D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Mar; 159(3):e253-e273. PubMed ID: 33541785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A User-Friendly Protocol for Mandibular Segmentation of CBCT Images for Superimposition and Internal Structure Analysis.
Li C; Lin L; Zheng Z; Chung CH
J Clin Med; 2021 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 33401443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
