These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31034112)

  • 1. The role of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for pancreatic, submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent lesions.
    Khoury T; Kadah A; Farraj M; Barhoum M; Livoff A; Mari A; Mahamid M; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2019 Sep; 30(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 31034112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration in gastrointestinal lesions.
    Khoury T; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2021 May; 32(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 33606331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures.
    Collins BT; Murad FM; Wang JF; Bernadt CT
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):518-24. PubMed ID: 23983161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
    Sbeit W; Khoury T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nebel JA; Soldan M; Dumonceau JM; de Souza Carvalho CE; Chagas VLA; de Assis PG; Lapa E Silva JR; Rezende GFDM
    Pancreas; 2021 Jul; 50(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 34347723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.
    Milluzzo SM; Olivari N; Rossi G; Bianchi D; Liserre B; Graffeo M; Lovera M; Correale L; Hassan C; Spada C
    Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 37186418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The level of agreement between rapid-on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate and surgical histological diagnosis in gastrointestinal lesions.
    Khoury T; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2021 Jul; 32(4):436-440. PubMed ID: 33983646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Performance of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy after the First Inconclusive Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions.
    Cho JH; Kim J; Lee HS; Ryu SJ; Jang SI; Kim EJ; Kang H; Lee SS; Song TJ; Bang S
    Gut Liver; 2024 Jan; 18(1):184-191. PubMed ID: 37317559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
    Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
    Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency.
    Syed A; Babich O; Rao B; Singh S; Carleton N; Gulati A; Kulkarni A; Garg M; Farah K; Kochhar G; Morrissey S; Mitre M; Kulkarni A; Dhawan M; Silverman JF; Pharaon M; Thakkar S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 31313531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The presence of rapid on-site evaluation did not increase the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions with core needle.
    Fabbri C; Fuccio L; Fornelli A; Antonini F; Liotta R; Frazzoni L; Larghi A; Maimone A; Paggi S; Gusella P; Barresi L; Polifemo AM; Iovine E; Macarri G; Cennamo V; Tarantino I
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):225-230. PubMed ID: 27194261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic and biliary tumors.
    Del Vecchio Blanco G; Palmieri G; Giannarelli D; Formica V; Portarena I; Nardecchia A; Troncone E; Benassi M; Giudice E; Anselmo A; Tisone G; Roselli M; Monteleone G; Paoluzi OA
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Apr; 56(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 33539716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.
    Chang KJ; Nguyen P; Erickson RA; Durbin TE; Katz KD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 May; 45(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 9165320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.