BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31034112)

  • 1. The role of rapid on-site evaluation on diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration for pancreatic, submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract and adjacent lesions.
    Khoury T; Kadah A; Farraj M; Barhoum M; Livoff A; Mari A; Mahamid M; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2019 Sep; 30(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 31034112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration in gastrointestinal lesions.
    Khoury T; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2021 May; 32(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 33606331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid on-site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures.
    Collins BT; Murad FM; Wang JF; Bernadt CT
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):518-24. PubMed ID: 23983161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation performed by endoscopists in solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang S; Ni M; Wang P; Zheng J; Sun Q; Xu G; Peng C; Shen S; Zhang W; Huang S; Wang L; Zou X; Lv Y
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 35614028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy was not more cost-effective than fine-needle aspiration with rapid on-site evaluation in gastrointestinal lesions diagnosis.
    Sbeit W; Khoury T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Aug; 49(8):944-947. PubMed ID: 33973746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid On-Site Evaluation by Endosonographer of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nebel JA; Soldan M; Dumonceau JM; de Souza Carvalho CE; Chagas VLA; de Assis PG; Lapa E Silva JR; Rezende GFDM
    Pancreas; 2021 Jul; 50(6):815-821. PubMed ID: 34347723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Estrada P; Benson M; Gopal D; Buehler D; Pfau P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid on-site evaluation improves the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid pancreatic lesions irrespective of technique: A single-centre experience.
    Milluzzo SM; Olivari N; Rossi G; Bianchi D; Liserre B; Graffeo M; Lovera M; Correale L; Hassan C; Spada C
    Cytopathology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 37186418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The level of agreement between rapid-on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate and surgical histological diagnosis in gastrointestinal lesions.
    Khoury T; Sbeit W
    Cytopathology; 2021 Jul; 32(4):436-440. PubMed ID: 33983646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Performance of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy after the First Inconclusive Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions.
    Cho JH; Kim J; Lee HS; Ryu SJ; Jang SI; Kim EJ; Kang H; Lee SS; Song TJ; Bang S
    Gut Liver; 2024 Jan; 18(1):184-191. PubMed ID: 37317559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions.
    Rong L; Kida M; Yamauchi H; Okuwaki K; Miyazawa S; Iwai T; Kikuchi H; Watanabe M; Imaizumi H; Koizumi W
    Dig Endosc; 2012 Sep; 24(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 22925290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency.
    Syed A; Babich O; Rao B; Singh S; Carleton N; Gulati A; Kulkarni A; Garg M; Farah K; Kochhar G; Morrissey S; Mitre M; Kulkarni A; Dhawan M; Silverman JF; Pharaon M; Thakkar S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 31313531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The presence of rapid on-site evaluation did not increase the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions with core needle.
    Fabbri C; Fuccio L; Fornelli A; Antonini F; Liotta R; Frazzoni L; Larghi A; Maimone A; Paggi S; Gusella P; Barresi L; Polifemo AM; Iovine E; Macarri G; Cennamo V; Tarantino I
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):225-230. PubMed ID: 27194261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic and biliary tumors.
    Del Vecchio Blanco G; Palmieri G; Giannarelli D; Formica V; Portarena I; Nardecchia A; Troncone E; Benassi M; Giudice E; Anselmo A; Tisone G; Roselli M; Monteleone G; Paoluzi OA
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Apr; 56(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 33539716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.
    Chang KJ; Nguyen P; Erickson RA; Durbin TE; Katz KD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1997 May; 45(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 9165320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.