BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31034352)

  • 1. Comparison of Flexural Properties of Bulk-fill Restorative/Flowable Composites and Their Conventional Counterparts.
    Eweis AH; Yap AU; Yahya NA
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 31034352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic Viscoelastic Characterization of Bulk-fill Resin-based Composites and Their Conventional Counterparts.
    Yap AU; Eweis AH; Yahya NA
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 31373890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of dietary solvents on flexural properties of bulk-fill composites.
    Eweis AH; Yap AU; Yahya NA
    Saudi Dent J; 2018 Jul; 30(3):232-239. PubMed ID: 29942108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic and Static Flexural Appraisal of Resin-based Composites: Comparison of the ISO and Mini-flexural Tests.
    Yap AU; Eweis AH; Yahya NA
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):E223-E231. PubMed ID: 30183531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic analysis of bulk-fill composites: Effect of food-simulating liquids.
    Eweis AH; Yap AU; Yahya NA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():183-188. PubMed ID: 28605721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Polymerization Shrinkage, Physical Properties, and Marginal Adaptation of Flowable and Restorative Bulk Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Jung JH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):375-386. PubMed ID: 28402737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Thermocycling on Biaxial Flexural Strength of CAD/CAM, Bulk Fill, and Conventional Resin Composite Materials.
    Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Machado CM; Gianinni M; Beltramini I; Piza M; Coelho PG; Hirata R; Bonfante EA
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(5):E254-E262. PubMed ID: 31172874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical properties of bulk-fill composite resin with or without a final layer of conventional composite resin.
    Lara L; Rocha MG; Menezes LR; Correr AB; Sinhoreti MAC; Oliveira D
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(3):60-64. PubMed ID: 35467546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk-Fill Resin-Based Composites.
    Yu P; Yap A; Wang XY
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 28002693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexural Strength of Conventional or Bulk-fill Resin Composite Repaired with High- or Low-viscosity Restorative Materials.
    Foscarini AV; Barros LS; Turssi CP; França F; Basting RT; Vieira WF
    Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):677-688. PubMed ID: 37881103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polymerization Stress and Gap Formation of Self-adhesive, Bulk-fill and Flowable Composite Resins.
    Nakano EL; de Souza A; Boaro L; Catalani LH; Braga RR; Gonçalves F
    Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):E308-E316. PubMed ID: 32516396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Flexural strength of conventional flowable, bulk fill flowable and highly filled flowable resin composites: in vitro study.].
    Sulca Gonzales EL; López-Flores AI
    Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2023; 11(3):e161. PubMed ID: 38288001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Viscoelastic Properties of Contemporary Bulk-fill Restoratives: A Dynamic-mechanical Analysis.
    Ong J; Yap AU; Hong JY; Eweis AH; Yahya NA
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(3):307-314. PubMed ID: 29533719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of extended light activation and increment thickness on physical properties of conventional and bulk-filled resin-based composites.
    de Mendonça BC; Soto-Montero JR; de Castro EF; Kury M; Cavalli V; Rueggeberg FA; Giannini M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 34826031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative.
    Alrahlah A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29358529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical performance of a conventional resin composite and its bulk-fill restorative counterpart after long-term accelerated aging.
    Naser Alavi F; Ghavami-Lahiji M; Habibi P
    Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(4):641-647. PubMed ID: 38127461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance.
    Ilie N; Bucuta S; Draenert M
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 23570302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: an in vitro study.
    Basheer RR; Hasanain FA; Abuelenain DA
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):546. PubMed ID: 38730400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulated Cuspal Deflection and Flexural Properties of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites.
    Shimatani Y; Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Fischer NG; Nagura Y; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 32216724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.