These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31034410)

  • 1. In Vivo Measurement of Brain Tissue Response After Irradiation: Comparison of T2 Relaxation, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, and Electrical Conductivity.
    Park JA; Kang KJ; Ko IO; Lee KC; Choi BK; Katoch N; Kim JW; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2779-2784. PubMed ID: 31034410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent conductivity contrast for tissue characterization using a dual-frequency range conductivity mapping magnetic resonance method.
    Kim DH; Chauhan M; Kim MO; Jeong WC; Kim HJ; Sersa I; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Feb; 34(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 25312916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decomposition of high-frequency electrical conductivity into extracellular and intracellular compartments based on two-compartment model using low-to-high multi-b diffusion MRI.
    Lee MB; Kim HJ; Kwon OI
    Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Mar; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 33766044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Software Toolbox for Low-Frequency Conductivity and Current Density Imaging Using MRI.
    Sajib SZK; Katoch N; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2505-2514. PubMed ID: 28767360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image-Based Evaluation of Irradiation Effects in Brain Tissues by Measuring Absolute Electrical Conductivity Using MRI.
    Kim JW; Park JA; Katoch N; Yang JU; Park S; Choi BK; Song SG; Kim TH; Kim HJ
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Oct; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 34771653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Five Conductivity Tensor Models and Image Reconstruction Methods Using MRI.
    Katoch N; Choi BK; Park JA; Ko IO; Kim HJ
    Molecules; 2021 Sep; 26(18):. PubMed ID: 34576970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-frequency dominant electrical conductivity imaging of in vivo human brain using high-frequency conductivity at Larmor-frequency and spherical mean diffusivity without external injection current.
    Jahng GH; Lee MB; Kim HJ; Je Woo E; Kwon OI
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117466. PubMed ID: 33075557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Irradiation on Brain Tumors Using MR-Based Electrical Conductivity Imaging.
    Park JA; Kim Y; Yang J; Choi BK; Katoch N; Park S; Hur YH; Kim JW; Kim HJ; Kim HC
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Dec; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 36612018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical conductivity-based contrast imaging for characterizing prostatic tissues: in vivo animal feasibility study.
    Cho YS; Hur YH; Seon HJ; Kim JW; Kim HJ
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):95. PubMed ID: 31638952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Hamamura MJ; Muftuler LT; Birgul O; Nalcioglu O
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2753-62. PubMed ID: 16723764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High frequency conductivity decomposition by solving physically constraint underdetermined inverse problem in human brain.
    Kwon OI; Lee MB; Jahng GH
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):3273. PubMed ID: 36841894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of measurement parameters on apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in diffusion-weighted-magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Schwenzer NF; Martirosian P
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Jan; 50(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 25247326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ion mobility imaging and contrast mechanism of apparent conductivity in MREIT.
    Oh TI; Kim YT; Minhas A; Seo JK; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(7):2265-77. PubMed ID: 21411866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diffusion-weighted MR of the brain: methodology and clinical application.
    Mascalchi M; Filippi M; Floris R; Fonda C; Gasparotti R; Villari N
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):155-97. PubMed ID: 15775887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conductivity imaging of canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system: postmortem experiments.
    Kim HJ; Lee BI; Cho Y; Kim YT; Kang BT; Park HM; Lee SY; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1341-53. PubMed ID: 17978419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gradient-based electrical conductivity imaging using MR phase.
    Gurler N; Ider YZ
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jan; 77(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 26762771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diffusion-weighting Caused by Spoiler Gradients in the Fast Imaging with Steady-state Precession Sequence May Lead to Inaccurate T
    Kobayashi Y; Terada Y
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 29794408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sci-Sat AM(1): Imaging-01: Tumour and normal tissue T2 and ADC distributions for a mouse model at 9.4T.
    Larocque M; Syme A; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part3):3414. PubMed ID: 28512910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of quantitative conductivity mapping and total tissue sodium concentration at 3T/4T.
    Liao Y; Lechea N; Magill AW; Worthoff WA; Gras V; Shah NJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Oct; 82(4):1518-1526. PubMed ID: 31095776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrical conductivity imaging by magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Oh SH; Han JY; Lee SY; Cho MH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Oct; 50(4):875-8. PubMed ID: 14523975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.