These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31035070)

  • 1. Biomechanical performance of cranial implants with different thicknesses and material properties: A finite element study.
    Marcián P; Narra N; Borák L; Chamrad J; Wolff J
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():43-52. PubMed ID: 31035070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Marcián P; Borák L; Narra N; Forouzanfar T; Wolff J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 44(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 26646634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Patient-Specific Cranial Implant Design Using Finite Element Analysis.
    Huys SEF; Van Gysel A; Mommaerts MY; Sloten JV
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():198-204. PubMed ID: 33529765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical characterization and numerical simulation of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cranial implants.
    El Halabi F; Rodriguez JF; Rebolledo L; Hurtós E; Doblaré M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1819-32. PubMed ID: 22098881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities.
    Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical behaviour of reconstructed defected skull with custom PEEK implant and Titanium fixture plates under dynamic loading conditions using FEM.
    Jindal P; Bharti J; Gupta V; Dhami SS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106063. PubMed ID: 37556925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the mechanical behaviour of PEEK and HA cranial implants under impact loading.
    Garcia-Gonzalez D; Jayamohan J; Sotiropoulos SN; Yoon SH; Cook J; Siviour CR; Arias A; Jérusalem A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():342-354. PubMed ID: 28160738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The potential of the three-dimensional printed titanium mesh implant for cranioplasty surgery applications: Biomechanical behaviors and surface properties.
    Huang MT; Juan PK; Chen SY; Wu CJ; Wen SC; Cho YC; Huang MS; Chou HH; Ou KL
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Apr; 97():412-419. PubMed ID: 30678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different biocompatible implant materials on the mechanical stability of dental implants under excessive oblique load.
    Bataineh K; Al Janaideh M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1206-1217. PubMed ID: 31670872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of 6 large PMMA skull reconstructions: A multi-criteria evaluation approach.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Marcián P; Borák L; Narra N; Forouzanfar T; Wolff J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179325. PubMed ID: 28609471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
    Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the effects of different materials in a tooth implant-supported fixed prosthesis using finite element method.
    Dargahi J; Najarian S; Talebi M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 16010040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Different Subperiosteal Implant Thicknesses on Mechanical Strength and Stress on Bone by Finite Element Analysis.
    Kundakcioglu A; Ayhan M
    Int J Med Sci; 2024; 21(9):1672-1680. PubMed ID: 39006845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
    Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body.
    Adam C; Pearcy M; McCombe P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 May; 18(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 12689775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.