These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31036446)

  • 1. Effect of Positioning of the Region of Interest on Bone Density of the Hip.
    Feit A; Levin N; McNamara EA; Sinha P; Whittaker LG; Malabanan AO; Rosen HN
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):426-431. PubMed ID: 31036446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Positioning of the ROI on BMD of the Forearm and Its Subregions.
    Rosen EO; McNamara EA; Whittaker LG; Malabanan AO; Rosen HN
    J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):529-533. PubMed ID: 29661688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of subtle positioning flaws on measured bone mineral density of the hip.
    McKiernan F; Washington W
    J Clin Densitom; 2005; 8(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 16055964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Region of Interest on Measurement of Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur: Simulation Analysis Using CT Images.
    Uemura K; Takao M; Otake Y; Iwasa M; Hamada H; Ando W; Sato Y; Sugano N
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2022 Nov; 111(5):475-484. PubMed ID: 35902385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of femoral rotation on hip bone mineral density measurement].
    Tang H; Ren SM; Luo XZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 12905737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inconsistency in filling in the bottom of the spine bone map affects reported spine bone mineral density.
    Malabanan AO; Whittaker LG; McNamara EA; Rosen HN
    Endocr Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(12):1315-8. PubMed ID: 25100396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone mineral density averaged over a region of interest on femur is affected by age-related change of bone geometry.
    Luo Y
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jun; 29(6):1419-1425. PubMed ID: 29508039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of patient positioning on measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur: a simulation study using computed tomographic images.
    Uemura K; Takao M; Otake Y; Takashima K; Hamada H; Ando W; Sato Y; Sugano N
    Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Feb; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 36826629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forearm bone mineral density measurement with different scanning positions: a study in right-handed Chinese using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Chang YJ; Yu W; Lin Q; Yao JP; Zhou XH; Tian JP
    J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 22154427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DXA Measured Distal Femur Bone Mineral Density in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Method Development and Reproducibility.
    Thomas B; Binkley N; Anderson PA; Krueger D
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 30228047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone Mineral Density Measurements Around Osseointegrated Implants: A Precision Study and Validation of Scan Protocol for Transfemoral Amputees.
    Hansen RL; Langdahl BL; Jørgensen PH; Petersen KK; Søballe K; Stilling M
    J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):244-251. PubMed ID: 28389068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA.
    Prevrhal S; Meta M; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Jan; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 14598025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive Bone Remodeling of the Femoral Bone After Tumor Resection Arthroplasty With an Uncemented Proximally Hydroxyapatite-Coated Stem.
    Andersen MR; Petersen MM
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 25843447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials.
    Khoo BC; Beck TJ; Qiao QH; Parakh P; Semanick L; Prince RL; Singer KP; Price RI
    Bone; 2005 Jul; 37(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 15869917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.
    Hamdy R; Kiebzak GM; Seier E; Watts NB
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1772-80. PubMed ID: 17019523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of nonstandard hip rotation on densitometric results of hip regions and potential misclassification of diagnosis.
    Qutbi M; Salek A; Soltanshahi M; Ajdari SE; Asli IN
    Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Aug; 14(1):86. PubMed ID: 31372753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.
    Leslie WD;
    Bone; 2006 Aug; 39(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16537116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying Pelvic Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Region-Free Analysis.
    Parker AM; Yang L; Farzi M; Pozo JM; Frangi AF; Wilkinson JM
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(4):480-485. PubMed ID: 28652104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Implications of Hip Flexion in the Measurement of Spinal Bone Mineral Density.
    Ikegami S; Kamimura M; Uchiyama S; Nakamura Y; Mukaiyama K; Kato H
    J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 26778480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal changes in mandibular bone mineral density compared with hip bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound at calcaneus and hand phalanges.
    Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Sep; 75(897):743-7. PubMed ID: 12200243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.