BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31036901)

  • 1. Maximum standardized uptake value on
    Rhu J; Hyun SH; Lee KH; Jo SJ; Lee KW; Park JB; Kim SJ
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6605. PubMed ID: 31036901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Histologic Subtype and FNCLCC Grade by SUVmax Measured on
    Li CP; Liu DN; Zhou NN; Tian XY; Wang Z; Liu BN; Hao CY
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():7191363. PubMed ID: 33505228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of
    Subramaniam S; Callahan J; Bressel M; Hofman MS; Mitchell C; Hendry S; Vissers FL; Van der Hiel B; Patel D; Van Houdt WJ; Tseng WW; Gyorki DE
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 123(4):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 33444466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
    Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
    J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which modality is better to diagnose high-grade transformation in retroperitoneal liposarcoma? Comparison of computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nakashima Y; Yokoyama Y; Ogawa H; Sakakibara A; Sunagawa M; Nishida Y; Mizuno T; Yamaguchi J; Onoe S; Watanabe N; Kawakatsu S; Igami T; Ebata T
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2023 Mar; 28(3):482-490. PubMed ID: 36583836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative Standardized Uptake Value of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves the Prediction of Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.
    Song BI; Kim HW; Won KS; Ryu SW; Sohn SS; Kang YN
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(26):e1037. PubMed ID: 26131811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic implication of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer.
    Kang JH; Jung DW; Pak KJ; Kim IJ; Kim HJ; Cho JK; Shin SC; Wang SG; Lee BJ
    Head Neck; 2018 Jan; 40(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 29130586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
    Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between glycolytic phenotype and tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcomas by 18F-FDG PET.
    Benz MR; Dry SM; Eilber FC; Allen-Auerbach MS; Tap WD; Elashoff D; Phelps ME; Czernin J
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 51(8):1174-81. PubMed ID: 20660389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of
    Akimoto E; Kadoya T; Kajitani K; Emi A; Shigematsu H; Ohara M; Masumoto N; Okada M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28993056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
    Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
    Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Preoperative
    Jo SJ; Kim KD; Lim SH; Kim J; Hyun SH; Park JB; Lee KW
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():868823. PubMed ID: 35712466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in resectable colorectal cancer.
    Lee JE; Kim SW; Kim JS; Choi KY; Kang WK; Oh ST; Yoo IeR; Kim SH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 18(36):5072-7. PubMed ID: 23049216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic significance of preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in uterine leiomyosarcoma.
    Park JY; Lee JW; Lee HJ; Lee JJ; Moon SH; Kang SY; Cheon GJ; Chung HH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 May; 28(3):e28. PubMed ID: 28382795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a diagnostic
    Lim CH; Seok HY; Hyun SH; Moon SH; Cho YS; Lee KH; Kim BT; Choi JY
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Mar; 74(3):207-215. PubMed ID: 30638733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The preoperative SUVmax for (18)F-FDG uptake predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Shi D; Cai G; Peng J; Li D; Li X; Xu Y; Cai S
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Dec; 15():991. PubMed ID: 26689966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of multiparameter
    Jiang Y; Hou G; Zhu Z; Huo L; Cheng W; Li F
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12887. PubMed ID: 32732920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the Diagnostic Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission/Computed Tomography in Detecting Prosthetic Aortic Graft Infection.
    Mitra A; Pencharz D; Davis M; Wagner T
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Nov; 53():78-85. PubMed ID: 30012456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The prognostic value of SUV
    Diao W; Tian F; Jia Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():1-7. PubMed ID: 30017264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Round cell liposarcoma presenting as an FDG-positive primary with an FDG-negative retroperitoneal metastasis: a pitfall for F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging.
    Rakheja R; Makis W; Nahal A; Alabed YZ; Abikhzer G; Probst S; Hickeson M
    Clin Nucl Med; 2011 Dec; 36(12):e213-6. PubMed ID: 22064114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.