552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31038406)
1. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Detection Modality: A Multicenter Study Comparing Recurrence Between Mammography and Breast US.
Yoon JH; Han K; Koh J; Kim GR; Kim HJ; Park YM; Youk JH; Chung J; Chae IH; Choi EJ; Moon HJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):2623-2633. PubMed ID: 31351671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography, US, and MRI to Assess Outcomes of Invasive Breast Cancer with Extensive Intraductal Component: A Matched Cohort Study.
Ha SM; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Kim HH
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 31135297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.
Moon HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30322671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mammography screening detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer according to women's characteristics: is it the same?
Théberge I; Vandal N; Guertin MH; Perron L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(2):525-535. PubMed ID: 30564969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Density in a Contemporary Cohort of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
Gooch JC; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Kurz E; Guth A; Lee J; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3472-3477. PubMed ID: 31147991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density and risk of second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.
Habel LA; Capra AM; Achacoso NS; Janga A; Acton L; Puligandla B; Quesenberry CP
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Oct; 19(10):2488-95. PubMed ID: 20929881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chronological Trends of Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Perspectives.
Lee SE; Kim HY; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Kim GR; Park YV; Moon HJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):8699-8709. PubMed ID: 34196861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor Progression.
Weigel S; Khil L; Hense HW; Decker T; Wellmann J; Heidrich J; Sommer A; Heidinger O; Heindel W
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):424-432. PubMed ID: 29106821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Preoperative Breast MR Imaging and MR-guided Surgery on Diagnosis and Surgical Outcome of Women with Invasive Breast Cancer with and without DCIS Component.
Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Wardelmann E; Kuhn W; Maass N; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):645-655. PubMed ID: 28445683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital mammography screening: association between detection rate and nuclear grade of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidinger O; Berkemeyer S; Hense HW
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24475843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes Following Negative Screening MRI Results in Korean Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Implications for the Next MRI Interval.
Park VY; Kim MJ; Kim GR; Yoon JH
Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):303-311. PubMed ID: 34032514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Detected at Screening US: Survival Rates and Clinical-Pathologic and Imaging Factors Associated with Recurrence.
Kim SY; Han BK; Kim EK; Choi WJ; Choi Y; Kim HH; Moon WK
Radiology; 2017 Aug; 284(2):354-364. PubMed ID: 28387638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.
Elshof LE; Schaapveld M; Rutgers EJ; Schmidt MK; de Munck L; van Leeuwen FE; Wesseling J
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Mar; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 28274272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
