222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31038997)
1. Does the thigh circumference affect the positioning of the acetabular component when using the direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty?
Jacobs CA; Kusema ET; Keeney BJ; Moschetti WE
Bone Joint J; 2019 May; 101-B(5):529-535. PubMed ID: 31038997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between the Posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.
Lin TJ; Bendich I; Ha AS; Keeney BJ; Moschetti WE; Tomek IM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):616-623. PubMed ID: 27612607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Bingham JS; Spangehl MJ; Hines JT; Taunton MJ; Schwartz AJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2927-2931. PubMed ID: 29853308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the use of an inclinometer improve the positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty?
Darrith B; Bell JA; Culvern C; Della Valle CJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):862-866. PubMed ID: 29954211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluoroscopically Guided Acetabular Component Positioning: Does It Reduce the Risk of Malpositioning in Obese Patients?
Gosthe RG; Suarez JC; McNamara CA; Calvo C; Patel PD
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3052-3055. PubMed ID: 28641967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Highly crosslinked polyethylene wear rates and acetabular component orientation: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Naudie DD; McCalden RW; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):891-897. PubMed ID: 29954202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.
Reina N; Putman S; Desmarchelier R; Sari Ali E; Chiron P; Ollivier M; Jenny JY; Waast D; Mabit C; de Thomasson E; Schwartz C; Oger P; Gayet LE; Migaud H; Ramdane N; Fessy MH;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):657-661. PubMed ID: 28629942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?
Kamara E; Robinson J; Bas MA; Rodriguez JA; Hepinstall MS
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):125-130. PubMed ID: 27499519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study.
Tripuraneni KR; Munson NR; Archibeck MJ; Carothers JT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2299-302. PubMed ID: 27067169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?
Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standing radiological analysis with a low-dose biplanar imaging system (EOS system) of the position of the components in total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach: a cohort study of 102 patients.
Morvan A; Moreau S; Combourieu B; Pansard E; Marmorat JL; Carlier R; Judet T; Lonjon G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 26920957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position Using a Novel Method to Determine Anteversion.
Boettner F; Zingg M; Emara AK; Waldstein W; Faschingbauer M; Kasparek MF
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1180-1185. PubMed ID: 27839959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning of Total Hip Arthroplasty Components Using a Posterior and Direct Anterior Approach.
Belyea CM; Lansford JL; Yim DG
Mil Med; 2022 Jan; 187(1-2):e11-e16. PubMed ID: 33231690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poor Acetabular Component Orientation Increases Revision Risk in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Tauriainen TJT; Niinimäki TT; Niinimäki JL; Nousiainen TOP; Leppilahti JI
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2204-2207. PubMed ID: 28291650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-operative digital imaging: assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty.
Hambright D; Hellman M; Barrack R
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):36-43. PubMed ID: 29292338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
El Bitar YF; Jackson TJ; Lindner D; Botser IB; Stake CE; Domb BG
Orthopedics; 2015 Jan; 38(1):e31-7. PubMed ID: 25611417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
Brun OL; Sund HN; Nordsletten L; Röhrl SM; Mjaaland KE
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1718-1722. PubMed ID: 31053468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct anterior approach in lateral position achieves superior cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a radiological comparative study of two consecutive series.
Hu F; Shang X; Zhang X; Chen M
Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):453-459. PubMed ID: 31900573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetabular Placement Accuracy With the Direct Anterior Approach Freehand Technique.
Soderquist MC; Scully R; Unger AS
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2748-2754. PubMed ID: 28499624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
