BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31039011)

  • 1. Utility of Restriction Spectrum Imaging Among Men Undergoing First-Time Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer.
    Felker ER; Raman SS; Shakeri S; Mirak SA; Bajgiran AM; Kwan L; Khoshnoodi P; ElKhoury FF; Margolis DJA; Karow D; Lu DSK; White N; Marks LS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):365-370. PubMed ID: 31039011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary?
    Felker ER; Raman SS; Margolis DJ; Lu DSK; Shaheen N; Natarajan S; Sharma D; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 28858541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection.
    McCammack KC; Schenker-Ahmed NM; White NS; Best SR; Marks RM; Heimbigner J; Kane CJ; Parsons JK; Kuperman JM; Bartsch H; Desikan RS; Rakow-Penner RA; Liss MA; Margolis DJ; Raman SS; Shabaik A; Dale AM; Karow DS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 26910114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
    Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
    Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria R; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3109-3116. PubMed ID: 29550953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk stratification of prostate cancer utilizing apparent diffusion coefficient value and lesion volume on multiparametric MRI.
    Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Turkbey B; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):610-616. PubMed ID: 27405584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
    Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective Inclusion of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Multiparametric Prostate MRI Structured Reports: Discrimination of Clinically Insignificant and Significant Cancers.
    Costa DN; Xi Y; Aziz M; Passoni N; Shakir N; Goldberg K; Francis F; Roehrborn CG; Leon AD; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 30383404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can DW-MRI, with its ADC values, be a reliable predictor of biopsy outcome in patients with suspected prostate cancer?
    Faletti R; Battisti G; Discalzi A; Grognardi ML; Martinello S; Oderda M; Gontero P; Bergamasco L; Cassinis MC; Fonio P
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 27193791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.
    Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Mendhiratta N; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Marshall S; Deng FM; Zhou M; Melamed J; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 26112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likert score 3 prostate lesions: Association between whole-lesion ADC metrics and pathologic findings at MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Meng X; Ream JM; Babb JS; Deng FM; Rusinek H; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 43(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 26131965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High spatiotemporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI improves the image-based discrimination of histopathology risk groups of peripheral zone prostate cancer: a supervised machine learning approach.
    Winkel DJ; Breit HC; Block TK; Boll DT; Heye TJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4828-4837. PubMed ID: 32328763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
    Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wang B; Gao J; Zhang Q; Zhang C; Liu G; Wei W; Huang H; Fu Y; Li D; Zhang B; Guo H
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Feb; 45(2):547-555. PubMed ID: 31907568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.