131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31039350)
1. Stability After Initial Decline in Coronary Revascularization Rates in the United States.
Raza S; Deo SV; Kalra A; Zia A; Altarabsheh SE; Deo VS; Mustafa RR; Younes A; Rao SV; Markowitz AH; Park SJ; Costa MA; Simon DI; Bhatt DL; Sabik JF
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Nov; 108(5):1404-1408. PubMed ID: 31039350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.
Epstein AJ; Polsky D; Yang F; Yang L; Groeneveld PW
JAMA; 2011 May; 305(17):1769-76. PubMed ID: 21540420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.
Head SJ; Milojevic M; Daemen J; Ahn JM; Boersma E; Christiansen EH; Domanski MJ; Farkouh ME; Flather M; Fuster V; Hlatky MA; Holm NR; Hueb WA; Kamalesh M; Kim YH; Mäkikallio T; Mohr FW; Papageorgiou G; Park SJ; Rodriguez AE; Sabik JF; Stables RH; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):386-398. PubMed ID: 30025574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization in the United States, 2003-2016.
Alkhouli M; Alqahtani F; Kalra A; Gafoor S; Alhajji M; Alreshidan M; Holmes DR; Lerman A
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Feb; 3(2):e1921326. PubMed ID: 32058558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting: an interprovincial comparison.
Ouzounian M; Ghali W; Yip AM; Buth KJ; Humphries K; Stukel TA; Norris CM; Southern DA; Galbraith PD; Thompson CR; Abel J; Love MP; Hassan A; Hirsch GM
Can J Cardiol; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1454-61. PubMed ID: 23927867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Accessibility, Cost, and Quality of Elective Coronary Revascularization Between Veterans Affairs and Community Care Hospitals.
Barnett PG; Hong JS; Carey E; Grunwald GK; Joynt Maddox K; Maddox TM
JAMA Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 3(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 29299607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2011).
Lopez-de-Andres A; Jimenez-García R; Hernandez-Barrera V; Perez-Farinos N; de Miguel-Yanes JM; Mendez-Bailon M; Jimenez-Trujillo I; de Miguel AG; Pino CG; Carrasco-Garrido P
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2014 Jan; 13():3. PubMed ID: 24383412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rates of Invasive Management of Cardiogenic Shock in New York Before and After Exclusion From Public Reporting.
Bangalore S; Guo Y; Xu J; Blecker S; Gupta N; Feit F; Hochman JS
JAMA Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 1(6):640-7. PubMed ID: 27463590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in the use of diagnostic coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery across North Carolina.
Jones WS; Patel MR; Holleran SA; Harrison JK; O'Connor CM; Phillips HR
Am Heart J; 2011 Nov; 162(5):932-7. PubMed ID: 22093211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.
Head SJ; Davierwala PM; Serruys PW; Redwood SR; Colombo A; Mack MJ; Morice MC; Holmes DR; Feldman TE; Ståhle E; Underwood P; Dawkins KD; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW
Eur Heart J; 2014 Oct; 35(40):2821-30. PubMed ID: 24849105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).
Pandey A; McGuire DK; de Lemos JA; Das SR; Berry JD; Brilakis ES; Banerjee S; Marso SP; Barsness GW; Simon DN; Roe M; Goyal A; Kosiborod M; Amsterdam EA; Kumbhani DJ
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2016 May; 9(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 27166210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical versus percutaneous coronary revascularization for multivessel disease in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Early Intervention Triage Strategy trial.
Ben-Gal Y; Mohr R; Feit F; Ohman EM; Kirtane A; Xu K; Mehran R; Stone GW
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 26019142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.
Parasca CA; Head SJ; Milojevic M; Mack MJ; Serruys PW; Morice MC; Mohr FW; Feldman TE; Colombo A; Dawkins KD; Holmes DR; Kappetein PA;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 9(24):2493-2507. PubMed ID: 28007201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures.
Mack MJ; Brown PP; Kugelmass AD; Battaglia SL; Tarkington LG; Simon AW; Culler SD; Becker ER
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8. PubMed ID: 14992867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence and outcome of surgical procedures after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with those after percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2.
Tokushige A; Shiomi H; Morimoto T; Ono K; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kadota K; Ando K; Shizuta S; Tada T; Tazaki J; Kato Y; Hayano M; Abe M; Hamasaki S; Ohishi M; Nakashima H; Mitsudo K; Nobuyoshi M; Kita T; Imoto Y; Sakata R; Okabayashi H; Hanyu M; Shimamoto M; Nishiwaki N; Komiya T; Kimura T;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 25074253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.
Serruys PW; Cavalcante R; Collet C; Kappetein AP; Sabik JF; Banning AP; Taggart DP; Sabaté M; Pomar J; Boonstra PW; Lembo NJ; Onuma Y; Simonton CA; Morice MC; McAndrew T; Dressler O; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 11(13):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 29976359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].
Yang BG; Yu XP; Chen F; Lyu SZ; Li Q; He JQ; Yuan F
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 45(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 28100341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for stable angina: meta-regression of randomized trials.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Moretti C; Palmerini T; Della Riva D; Mariani A; Omedè P; DiNicolantonio JJ; Biondi-Zoccai G; Gaita F
Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 May; 38(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24657881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.
Bajaj NS; Patel N; Kalra R; Marogil P; Bhardwaj A; Arora G; Arora P
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2017 Jul; 3(3):173-182. PubMed ID: 28838092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in the Practice of Coronary Revascularization between 2006 and 2010 in the Republic of Korea.
Choi YJ; Kim JB; Cho SJ; Cho J; Sohn J; Cho SK; Ha KH; Kim C
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jul; 56(4):895-903. PubMed ID: 26069109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
